Complex causal process diagrams for analyzing the health impacts of policy interventions

被引:65
作者
Joffe, M [1 ]
Mindell, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London W2 1PF, England
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2005.063693
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Causal diagrams are rigorous tools for controlling confounding. They also can be used to describe complex causal systems, which is done routinely in communicable disease epidemiology. The use of change diagrams has advantages over static diagrams, because change diagrams are more tractable, relate better to interventions, and have clearer interpretations. Causal diagrams are a useful basis for modeling. They make assumptions explicit, provide a framework for analysis, generate testable predictions, explore the effects of interventions, and identify data gaps. Causal diagrams can be used to integrate different types of information and to facilitate communication both among public health experts and between public health experts and experts in other fields. Causal diagrams allow the use of instrumental variables, which can help control confounding and reverse causation.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 479
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Adams J., 1995, RISK
[2]  
ADAMS J, EVALUATING EFFECTIVE
[3]  
BARTLEY M, 1999, SOCIAL DETERMINANTS, P78
[4]   MATERNAL EDUCATION AND CHILD SURVIVAL - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF SURVEY DATA FROM 17 COUNTRIES [J].
BICEGO, GT ;
BOERMA, JT .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1993, 36 (09) :1207-1227
[5]  
BRIGGS DJ, 1997, ENV HLTH ALL, P187
[6]  
BUCK D, 1995, TOBACCO JOBS
[7]   Effect of air-pollution control on death rates in Dublin, Ireland: an intervention study [J].
Clancy, L ;
Goodman, P ;
Sinclair, H ;
Dockery, DW .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9341) :1210-1214
[8]  
Dahlgren G, 1991, Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health, P1
[9]   Bringing context back into epidemiology: Variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis [J].
Diez-Roux, AV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 88 (02) :216-222
[10]  
DORNER D, 1996, LOGIC FAILURE