White-Tailed Deer Incidents With US Civil Aircraft

被引:20
作者
Biondi, Kristin M. [1 ]
Belant, Jerrold L. [1 ]
Martin, James A. [1 ,2 ]
Devault, Travis L. [3 ]
Wang, Guiming [4 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Forest & Wildlife Res Ctr, Carnivore Ecol Lab, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Forest & Wildlife Res Ctr, Agr Ecol Lab, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[3] Anim & Plant Hlth Inspect Serv, USDA, Wildlife Serv, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr,Ohio Field Stn, Sandusky, OH 44870 USA
[4] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2011年 / 35卷 / 03期
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
airport; airport management; aviation hazard; Odocoileus virginianus; white-tailed deer; wildlife-aircraft incident; wildlife strike;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.46
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aircraft incidents with ungulates cause substantial economic losses and pose risks to human safety. We analyzed 879 white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) incidents with United States civil aircraft from 1990 to 2009 reported in the Federal Aviation Administration National Wildlife Strike Database. During that time, deer incidents followed a quadratic response curve, peaking in 1994 and declining thereafter. There appeared to be some seasonal patterning in incident frequency, with deer incidents increasing overall from January to November, and peaking in October and November (30.7%). Most incidents (64.8%) occurred at night, but incident rates were greatest (P <= 0.001) at dusk. Landing-roll represented 60.7% of incidents and more incidents occurred during landing than take-off (P <= 0.001). Almost 70% of deer incidents had an effect on flight. About 6% of pilots attempted to avoid deer, and were less likely to sustain damage. Aircraft were 25 times more likely to be destroyed when multiple deer were struck versus a single individual. Deer incidents represented 0.9% of all wildlife incidents, yet 5.4% of total estimated costs. Reported costs for deer incident damages during this period exceeded US$36 million, with US$75 million in total estimated damages. Deer incidents resulted in 1 of 24 human deaths and 26 of 217 injuries reported for all wildlife incidents with aircraft during the reporting period. Managers should implement exclusion techniques (e.g., fences, cattle guards, or electrified mats) to maximize reductions in deer use of airfields. Where exclusion is not practical, managers should consider lethal control, habitat modifications, increased monitoring and hazing, and improved technology to aircraft and runway lighting to reduce incidents at airports. (C) 2011 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 309
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
  • [2] Evaluation of propane exploders as white-tailed deer deterrents
    Belant, JL
    Seamans, TW
    Dwyer, CP
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 1996, 15 (06) : 575 - 578
  • [3] Cattle guards reduce white-tailed deer crossings through fence openings
    Belant, JL
    Seamans, TW
    Dwyer, CP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 1998, 44 (04) : 247 - 249
  • [4] Bissonette John A., 2008, Human-Wildlife Conflicts, V2, P17
  • [5] Wildlife collisions with aircraft: A missing component of land-use planning for airports
    Blackwell, Bradley F.
    DeVault, Travis L.
    Fernandez-Juricic, Esteban
    Dolbeer, Richard A.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2009, 93 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [6] Enhancing the Perceived Threat of Vehicle Approach to Deer
    Blackwell, Bradley F.
    Seamans, Thomas W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 73 (01) : 128 - 135
  • [7] BOMFORD M, 1990, WILDLIFE SOC B, V18, P411
  • [8] Cleary E. C., 1999, WILDLIFE HAZARD MANA
  • [9] Conover M. R., 2002, RESOLVING HUMAN WILD
  • [10] CONOVER MR, 1991, WILDLIFE SOC B, V19, P46