Intra-operative assessment of excised breast tumour margins using ClearEdge imaging device

被引:48
作者
Dixon, J. M. [1 ,3 ]
Renshaw, L. [1 ]
Young, O. [1 ]
Kulkarni, D. [1 ]
Saleem, T. [1 ]
Sarfaty, M. [2 ]
Sreenivasan, R. [2 ]
Kusnick, C. [2 ]
Thomas, J. [4 ]
Williams, L. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh Breast Unit, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] LS BioPath, Mountain View, CA USA
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Western Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
EJSO | 2016年 / 42卷 / 12期
关键词
Infra-operative margin assessment; Breast cancer; Re-excision; CONSERVING SURGERY; SURGICAL MARGINS; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CONSERVATION SURGERY; POSITIVE MARGINS; CANCER; CARCINOMA; WOMEN; RATES; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.141
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) aims to remove a breast cancer completely and obtain clear margins. Complete excision is essential to reduce the risk of local recurrence. The ClearEdge (TM) (CE) imaging device examines margins of excised breast tissue intra-operatively. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of the device in detecting margin involvement in patients having BCS. Methods: In Phase-1 58 patients underwent BCS and had 334 margins assessed by the device. In Phase-2 the device was used in 63 patients having BCS and 335 margins were assessed. Patients with margins considered close or involved by the CE device were re-excised. Results: The margin assessment accuracies in Phase-1 and Phase-2 compared to permanent section pathology were very similar: sensitivity (84.3% and 87.3%), specificity (81.9% and 75.6%), positive predictive value (67.2% and 63.6%), and negative predictive value (92.2% and 92.4%). The false positive rate (18.1% and 24.4%) and false negative rate (15.7% and 12.7%) were low in both phases. In Phase-2 re-excision rate was 37%, but in the 54 where the CE device was used appropriately the re-excision rate was 17%. Had all surgeons interpreted all images appropriately and re-excised margins detected as abnormal by the device in Phase-2 then the re-excision rate would have been 7%. Conclusion: This study shows that the CE device has potential to reduce re-excision after BCS and further randomized studies of its value are warranted. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1834 / 1840
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
  • [2] A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery
    Allweis, Tanir M.
    Kaufman, Zvi
    Lelcuk, Shlomo
    Pappo, Itzhak
    Karni, Tami
    Schneebaum, Shlomo
    Spector, Rona
    Schindel, Asher
    Hershko, Dan
    Zilberman, Moshe
    Sayfan, Joel
    Berlin, Yuri
    Hadary, Amram
    Olsha, Oded
    Paran, Haim
    Gutman, Mordechai
    Carmon, Moshe
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 196 (04) : 483 - 489
  • [3] [Anonymous], 34 ANN SAN ANT BREAS
  • [4] Balch GC, 2005, AM SURGEON, V71, P22
  • [5] Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique
    Chagpar, AB
    Martin, RCG
    Hagendoorn, LJ
    Chao, C
    McMasters, KM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (04) : 399 - 402
  • [6] Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: A series of 400 procedures
    D'Halluin, Francois
    Tas, Patrick
    Rouquette, Sophie
    Bendavid, Cecile
    Foucher, Fabrice
    Meshba, Habiba
    Blanchot, Jerome
    Coue, Olivier
    Leveque, Jean
    [J]. BREAST, 2009, 18 (04) : 248 - 253
  • [7] Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery
    Dillon, Mary F.
    Maguire, Aoife A.
    McDermott, Enda W.
    Myers, Clara
    Hill, Arnold D. K.
    O'Doherty, Ann
    Quinn, Cecily M.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2008, 21 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [8] Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ
    Dillon, Mary F.
    Mc Dermott, Enda W.
    O'Doherty, Ann
    Quinn, Cecily M.
    Hill, Arnold D.
    O'Higgins, Niall
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (05) : 1618 - 1628
  • [9] Association between underestimation of tumour size by imaging and incomplete excision in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer
    Dixon, J. M.
    Newlands, C.
    Dodds, C.
    Thomas, J.
    Williams, L. J.
    Kunkler, I. H.
    Bing, A.
    Macaskill, E. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (07) : 830 - 838
  • [10] High-frequency ultrasound for intraoperative margin assessments in breast conservation surgery: a feasibility study
    Doyle, Timothy E.
    Factor, Rachel E.
    Ellefson, Christina L.
    Sorensen, Kristina M.
    Ambrose, Brady J.
    Goodrich, Jeffrey B.
    Hart, Vern P.
    Jensen, Scott C.
    Patel, Hemang
    Neumayer, Leigh A.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2011, 11