Vortex induced vibration and flutter instability of two parallel cable-stayed bridges

被引:8
作者
Junruang, Jirawat [1 ]
Boonyapinyo, Virote [1 ]
机构
[1] Thammasat Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Rangsit Campus, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
关键词
wind tunnel; parallel cable-stayed bridges; vortex induced vibration; flutter derivatives; covariance-driven stochastic subspace identification; AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; DERIVATIVES; IDENTIFICATION; INTERFERENCE; STABILITY; DISTANCE;
D O I
10.12989/was.2020.30.6.633
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The objective of this work was to investigate the interference effects of two-parallel bridge decks on aerodynamic coefficients, vortex-induced vibration, flutter instability and flutter derivatives. The two bridges have significant difference in cross-sections, dynamic properties, and flutter speeds of each isolate bridge. The aerodynamic static tests and aeroelastic tests were performed in TU-AIT boundary layer wind tunnel in Thammasat University (Thailand) with sectional models in a 1:90 scale. Three configuration cases, including the new bridge stand-alone (case 1), the upstream new bridge and downstream existing bridge (case 2), and the downstream new bridge and the upstream existing bridge (case 3), were selected in this study. The covariance-driven stochastic subspace identification technique (SSI-COV) was applied to identify aerodynamic parameters (i.e., natural frequency, structural damping and state space matrix) of the decks. The results showed that, interference effects of two bridges decks on aerodynamic coefficients result in the slightly reduction of the drag coefficient of case 2 and 3 when compared with case 1. The two parallel configurations of the bridge result in vortex-induced vibrations (VIV) and significantly lower the flutter speed compared with the new bridge alone. The huge torsional motion from upstream new bridge (case 2) generated turbulent wakes flow and resulted in vertical aerodynamic damping H1* of existing bridge becomes zero at wind speed of 72.01 m/s. In this case, the downstream existing bridge was subjected to galloping oscillation induced by the turbulent wake of upstream new bridge. The new bridge also results in significant reduction of the flutter speed of existing bridge from the 128.29 m/s flutter speed of the isolated existing bridge to the 75.35 m/s flutter speed of downstream existing bridge.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 648
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
AES Group Kinematics and OPAC, 2001, RAMA IX BRIDGE UNPUB
[2]   Flutter derivatives from free decay tests of a rectangular B/D=10 section estimated by optimized system identification methods [J].
Andersen, Michael Styrk ;
Oiseth, Ole ;
Johansson, Jens ;
Brandt, Anders .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 156 :284-293
[3]   Aerodynamic interference and vortex-induced vibrations on parallel bridges: The Ewijk bridge during different stages of refurbishment [J].
Argentini, T. ;
Rocchi, D. ;
Zasso, A. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2015, 147 :276-282
[4]   Nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis of suspension bridges [J].
Boonyapinyo, V ;
Lauhatanon, Y ;
Lukkunaprasit, P .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2006, 28 (05) :793-803
[5]   WIND-INDUCED NONLINEAR LATERAL-TORSIONAL BUCKLING OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES [J].
BOONYAPINYO, V ;
YAMADA, H ;
MIYATA, T .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1994, 120 (02) :486-506
[6]   Advanced aerodynamic analysis of suspension bridges by state-space approach [J].
Boonyapinyo, V ;
Miyata, T ;
Yamada, H .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 125 (12) :1357-1366
[7]  
Boonyapinyo V., 2009, 7 AS PAC C WIND ENG
[8]   Data-driven stochastic subspace identification of flutter derivatives of bridge decks [J].
Boonyapinyo, Virote ;
Janesupasaeree, Tharach .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2010, 98 (12) :784-799
[9]  
Dallaire P.-O., 2016, 8 INT C BLUFF BOD AE
[10]   Aerodynamic characteristics investigation of Megane multi-box bridge deck by CFD-LES simulations and experimental tests [J].
Dragomirescu, Elena ;
Wang, Zhida ;
Hoftyzer, Michael S. .
WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2016, 22 (02) :161-184