Mode of delivery in non-cephalic presenting twins: a systematic review

被引:22
作者
Bisschop, Charlotte N. Steins [1 ]
Vogelvang, Tatjana E. [2 ]
May, Anne M. [1 ]
Schuitemaker, Nico W. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Diakonessen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Twins; Non-cephalic presentation; Mode of delivery; Systematic review; NONVERTEX 2ND TWIN; VAGINAL DELIVERY; CESAREAN-SECTION; EXTERNAL VERSION; INTRAPARTUM MANAGEMENT; BREECH EXTRACTION; VERTEX; 1ST; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-012-2294-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
This systematic review aims to determine if there are evidence-based recommendations for the optimal mode of delivery for non-cephalic presenting first- and/or second twins. We investigated the impact of the mode of delivery on neonatal outcome for twin deliveries with (1) the first twin (twin A) in non-cephalic presentation, (2) the second (twin B) in non-cephalic presentation and (3) both twins in non-cephalic presentation. A computer-aided search of Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Cochrane databases was carried out and quality of the studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and the GRADE approach. One high-quality clinical trial (60 twin pairs) and 16 moderate/low-quality observational studies (3,167 twin pairs) showed no difference in neonatal outcome between vaginal and caesarean delivery in twin A and/or B. Our results do not suggest benefit of caesarean over vaginal delivery for selected twin gestations with twin A and/or twin B in non-cephalic presentation. However, no final conclusion can be drawn due to the small sample sizes and statistic limitations of the included studies. Randomized studies with sufficient power are required to make a strong recommendation.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 247
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abu-Heija A. T., 1998, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Abingdon), V18, P47
[2]   Retrospective study of outcome on vaginal and abdominal delivery in twin pregnancy in which twin 1 is presenting by the breech [J].
Abu-Heija, AT ;
Ziadeh, S ;
Abukteish, F ;
Obeidat, A .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1998, 261 (02) :71-73
[3]  
ACKER D, 1982, OBSTET GYNECOL, V59, P710
[4]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, 2004, Obstet Gynecol, V104, P869
[5]  
[Anonymous], PER ZORG NED 2008
[6]   Apgar scores in assessing morbidity of the second neonate of cephalic/non-cephalic twins in different delivery modes [J].
Atis, A. ;
Aydin, Y. ;
Donmez, M. ;
Sermet, H. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 31 (01) :43-47
[7]   BREECH EXTRACTION VERSUS CESAREAN-SECTION FOR THE REMAINING 2ND TWIN [J].
BERGLUND, L ;
AXELSSON, O .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 68 (05) :435-438
[8]  
BLICKSTEIN I, 1993, J REPROD MED, V38, P879
[9]   Delivery of breech first twins: A multicenter retrospective study [J].
Blickstein, I ;
Goldman, RD ;
Kupferminc, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (01) :37-42
[10]  
BLICKSTEIN I, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V69, P774