共 25 条
Automatic exposure control at MDCT based on the contrast-to-noise ratio: Theoretical background and phantom study
被引:10
作者:
Funama, Yoshinori
[1
]
Sugaya, Yoshiaki
[2
]
Miyazaki, Osamu
[2
]
Utsunomiya, Daisuke
[3
]
Yamashita, Yasuyuki
[3
]
Awai, Kazuo
[4
]
机构:
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Fac Life Sci, Dept Med Phys, Kumamoto, Japan
[2] Hitachi Med Corp, CT Syst Div, Design Dept, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[3] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kumamoto, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Univ, Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Hiroshima, Japan
来源:
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS
|
2013年
/
29卷
/
01期
关键词:
Contrast-to-noise ratio;
AEC;
Radiation dose;
Lesion detectability;
TUBE CURRENT MODULATION;
MULTIDETECTOR ROW CT;
Z-AXIS MODULATION;
DOSE REDUCTION;
IMAGE QUALITY;
HEPATIC ENHANCEMENT;
LIVER CONTRAST;
OPTIMIZATION;
ABDOMEN;
PELVIS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.11.004
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
Purpose: To develop a new automatic exposure control (AEC) technique based on the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and provide constant lesion detectability. Methods: Lesion detectability is affected by factors such as image noise, lesion contrast, and lesion size. We performed ROC analysis to assess the relationship between the optimum CNR and the lesion diameter at various levels of lesion contrast. We then developed a CNR-based AEC algorithm based on lesion detectability. Using CNR- based AEC algorithm, we performed visual evaluation of low-contrast detectability by 5 radiologists on a low-contrast module of the Catphan phantom, a contrast-difference level of 1.0% (difference in the CT number = 10 HU), and objects 3.0-9.0 mm in diameter. Results: On step-and-shoot scans the mean detection fraction with CNR-based AEC remained almost constant from 88 to 99% regardless of the lesion size. We observed the same trend on helical scans, the mean detection fraction with CNR-based AEC exhibited a high score from 91 to 100%. Although CNR-based AEC maintains higher CNR for smaller size or lower contrast lesion, radiation dose on 3 mm lesion resulted in about 13 times larger than that of 9 mm lesion size. CTDIvol for the CNR-based AEC technique changed dramatically with the SDZ from 7.5 to 100.0 mGy for step-and-shoot scans and from 9.1 to 121.5 mGy for helical scans. Conclusions: From the viewpoint of ROC analysis-based CNR for lesion detection, CNR-based AEC potentially provide image quality advantages for clinical implementation. (C) 2011 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文