Considerations that will determine if competency-based assessment is a sustainable innovation

被引:16
作者
Dauphinee, W. Dale [1 ,2 ]
Boulet, John R. [1 ]
Norcini, John J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Adv Int Med Educ & Res, 3624 Market St,Fourth Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] McGill Univ, 1140 Pine Ave West, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
关键词
Clinical assessment; Competency-based assessment; Disruptive innovation; Sustainability; Entrustable professional activities; Post-graduate medical assessment; Programmatic assessment; Undergraduate assessment; STANDARDIZED PATIENTS; FACULTY-DEVELOPMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; CERTIFICATION; MILESTONES; CANADA; SKILLS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s10459-018-9833-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Educational assessment for the health professions has seen a major attempt to introduce competency based frameworks. As high level policy developments, the changes were intended to improve outcomes by supporting learning and skills development. However, we argue that previous experiences with major innovations in assessment offer an important road map for developing and refining assessment innovations, including careful piloting and analyses of their measurement qualities and impacts. Based on the literature, numerous assessment workshops, personal interactions with potential users, and our 40years of experience in implementing assessment change, we lament the lack of a coordinated approach to clarify and improve measurement qualities and functionality of competency based assessment (CBA). To address this worrisome situation, we offer two roadmaps to guide CBA's further development. Initially, reframe and address CBA as a measurement development opportunity. Secondly, using a roadmap adapted from the management literature on sustainable innovation, the medical assessment community needs to initiate an integrated plan to implement CBA as a sustainable innovation within existing educational programs and self-regulatory enterprises. Further examples of down-stream opportunities to refocus CBA at the implementation level within faculties and within the regulatory framework of the profession are offered. In closing, we challenge the broader assessment community in medicine to step forward and own the challenge and opportunities to reframe CBA as an innovation to improve the quality of the clinical educational experience. The goal is to optimize assessment in health education and ultimately improve the public's health.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 421
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM), 2018, HISTORY
[2]  
American Education Research Association American Psychological Association and the National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, Standards for educational and psychological testing, V2nd ed
[3]   In-training evaluations: developing an automated screening tool to measure report quality [J].
Bismil, Ramprasad ;
Dudek, Nancy L. ;
Wood, Timothy J. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 48 (07) :724-732
[4]   The Use of Standardized Patient Assessments for Certification and Licensure Decisions [J].
Boulet, John R. ;
Smee, Sydney M. ;
Dillon, Gerard F. ;
Gimpel, John R. .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2009, 4 (01) :35-42
[5]   Using standardized patients to assess the interpersonal skills of physicians [J].
Boulet, JR ;
Ben-David, MF ;
Ziv, A ;
Burdick, WP ;
Curtis, M ;
Peitzman, S ;
Gary, NE .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1998, 73 (10) :S94-S96
[6]   Advancing Competency-Based Medical Education: A Charter for Clinician-Educators [J].
Carraccio, Carol ;
Englander, Robert ;
Van Melle, Elaine ;
ten Cate, Olle ;
Lockyer, Jocelyn ;
Chan, Ming-Ka ;
Frank, Jason R. ;
Snell, Linda S. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2016, 91 (05) :645-649
[7]   A call for outcomes research in medical education [J].
Chen, FM ;
Bauchner, H ;
Burstin, H .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2004, 79 (10) :955-960
[8]  
Christensen CM, 2013, INNOVATORS SOLUTION, P31
[9]  
Christensen CM, 2000, INNOVATORS DILEMMA N, P225
[10]  
Christensen CM, 2000, INNOVATORS DILEMMA N, pvii