Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach

被引:154
作者
Harrison, Paula A. [1 ]
Dunford, Rob [1 ,2 ]
Barton, David N. [3 ]
Kelemen, Eszter [4 ,5 ]
Martin-Lopez, Berta [6 ]
Norton, Lisa [1 ]
Termansen, Mette [7 ]
Saarikoski, Heli [8 ]
Hendriks, Kees [9 ]
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik [10 ]
Czucz, Balint [11 ,12 ]
Garcia-Llorente, Marina [13 ,14 ]
Howard, David [1 ]
Jacobs, Sander [15 ]
Karlsen, Martin
Kopperoinen, Leena
Madsen, Andes [16 ,17 ]
Rusch, Graciela [3 ]
van Eupen, Michiel [9 ]
Verweij, Peter [9 ]
Smith, Ron [18 ]
Tuomasjukka, Diana [19 ]
Zulian, Grazia [20 ]
机构
[1] Lancaster Environm Ctr, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lib Ave, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[3] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
[4] ESSRG, Romer Floris 38, H-1024 Budapest, Hungary
[5] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Fovam Ter 8, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
[6] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Inst Eth & Transdisciplinary Sustainabil Res, Scharnhorststr 1, D-21355 Luneburg, Germany
[7] Aarhus Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[8] Finnish Environm Inst, POB 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland
[9] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Res, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[10] Norwegian Univ Life Sci NMBU, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies Noragric, POB 5003, N-1432 As, Norway
[11] Hungarian Acad Sci, Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Ecol & Bot, Alkotmany U 2-4, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary
[12] Museum Natl Hist Nat, European Top Ctr Biol Divers, 57 Rue Cuvier, FR-75231 Paris 05, France
[13] Madrid Inst Rural Agr & Food Res & Dev IMIDRA, Dept Appl Res & Agr Extens, Ctra Madrid Barcelona N-2,KM 38-200, Madrid 28802, Spain
[14] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, Madrid 28049, Spain
[15] Res Inst Nat & Forest INBO, Kliniekstr 25, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[16] HUGIN EXPERT AS, Gasvaerksvej 5, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[17] Aalborg Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Selma Lagerlof Vej 300, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[18] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB, Midlothian, Scotland
[19] EFI, Yliopistokatu 6, Joensuu 80100, Finland
[20] Joint Res Ctr, Via Fermi 1, I-21020 Ispra Varese, Italy
关键词
Guidance; Method; Tool; Decision trees; Biophysical; Monetary; Socio-cultural; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; INTEGRATED VALUATION; URBAN AREAS; VALUES; SCALE; CONSERVATION; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A range of methods are available for assessing ecosystem services. Methods differ in their aims; from mapping and modelling the supply and demand of ecosystem services to appraising their economic and non-economic importance through valuation techniques. Comprehensive guidance for the selection of appropriate ecosystem service assessment methods that address the requirements of different decision-making contexts is lacking. This paper tackles this gap using the experience from 27 case studies which applied different biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary valuation methods to operationalise the ecosystem service concept towards sustainable land, water and urban management. A survey of the reasons why the case study teams selected particular methods revealed that stakeholder-oriented reasons, such as stakeholder participation, inclusion of local knowledge and ease of communication, and decision-oriented reasons, such as the purpose of the case study and the ecosystem services at stake, were key considerations in selecting a method. Pragmatic reasons such as available data, resources and expertise were also important factors. This information was used to develop a set of linked decision trees, which aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners in choosing ecosystem service assessment methods that are suitable for their context. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 498
页数:18
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss [J].
Alkemade, Rob ;
van Oorschot, Mark ;
Miles, Lera ;
Nellemann, Christian ;
Bakkenes, Michel ;
ten Brink, Ben .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2009, 12 (03) :374-390
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, System of environmental-economic accounting 2012: Central framework
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, APPR REP EC SERV INC
[4]  
[Anonymous], GUIDANCE MANUAL ASSE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Change Adapt Socio-Ecol Syst, DOI DOI 10.1515/CASS-2015-0001
[6]  
[Anonymous], FP7 EUR COMM
[7]   A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Waage, Sissel ;
Winthrop, Robert .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E27-E39
[8]   Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities [J].
Baro, Francesc ;
Haase, Dagmar ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Frantzeskaki, Niki .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 55 :146-158
[9]   (Dis) integrated valuation - Assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support [J].
Barton, D. N. ;
Kelemen, E. ;
Dick, J. ;
Martin-Lopez, B. ;
Gomez-Baggethun, E. ;
Jacobs, S. ;
Hendriks, C. M. A. ;
Termansen, M. ;
Garcia-Llorente, M. ;
Primmer, E. ;
Dunford, R. ;
Harrison, P. A. ;
Turkelboom, F. ;
Saarikoski, H. ;
van Dijk, J. ;
Rusch, G. M. ;
Palomo, I. ;
Yli-Pelkonen, V. J. ;
Carvalho, L. ;
Baro, F. ;
Langemeyer, J. ;
van der Wal, J. Tjalling ;
Mederly, P. ;
Priess, J. A. ;
Luque, S. ;
Berry, P. ;
Santos, R. ;
Odee, D. ;
Martines Pastur, G. ;
Garcia Blanco, G. ;
Saarela, S-R. ;
Silaghi, D. ;
Pataki, G. ;
Masi, F. ;
Vadineanu, A. ;
Mukhopadhyay, R. ;
Lapola, D. M. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 29 :529-541
[10]   Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Atkinson, Giles ;
Turner, Kerry .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (02) :177-218