Tree and stand-scale factors affecting richness and composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in deciduous woodland key habitats

被引:93
作者
Mezaka, Anna [1 ]
Brumelis, Guntis [1 ]
Piterans, Alfons [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Latvia, Fac Biol, Dept Bot & Ecol, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia
关键词
Epiphytes; Bryophytes; Lichens; Tree; Woodland key habitats; ASPEN POPULUS-TREMULA; ANNOTATED CHECKLIST; SPECIES RICHNESS; CRUSTOSE LICHENS; FOREST; DIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES; SOUTHERN; EUROPE; METAPOPULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-012-0361-8
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Conservation and sustainable forestry are essential in a multi-functional landscape. In this respect, ecological studies on epiphytes are needed to determine abiotic and biotic factors associated with high diversity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate relative sensitivity of conservation targets (epiphytic bryophytes and lichens) in relation to contrasting environmental variables (tree species, tree diameter at breast height, bark crevice depth, pH, tree inclination, pH, forest stand age, area and type) in boreo-nemoral forests. The study was conducted in Latvian 34 woodland key habitat (WKH) boreo-nemoral forest stands. Generalized linear mixed models and canonical correspondence analysis showed that tree species and tree bark pH were the most important variables explaining epiphytic bryophyte and lichen composition and richness (total, Red-listed, WKH indicator species). Forest stand level factors, such as stand size and habitat type, had only minor influence on epiphytic species composition and richness. The results of the present study indicate a need to maintain the diversity of tree species and large trees, particularly Acer platanoides, Carpinus betulus, Fraxinus excelsior, Populus tremula, Tilia cordata, Ulmus glabra and Ulmus laevis in conservation of epiphytic bryophyte and lichen communities in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:3221 / 3241
页数:21
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Abolin AA, 1968, LISTOSTEBELNIJE MHI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Folia Cryptog. Estonica
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, LATVIJAS RETAS AIZSA
[4]   Influence of management on the species composition of epiphytic cryptogams in Danish Fagus forests [J].
Aude, Erik ;
Poulsen, Roar S. .
APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2000, 3 (01) :81-88
[5]   Bryophyte responses to fragmentation in temperate coastal rainforests: A functional group approach [J].
Baldwin, L. K. ;
Bradfield, G. E. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 136 (03) :408-422
[6]  
Barkman J. J., 1958, On the ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes, including a taxonomic survey and description of their vegetation units in Europe
[8]   Edge effects on epiphytic communities in a Mediterranean Quercus pyrenaica forest [J].
Belinchon, R. ;
Martinez, I ;
Escudero, A. ;
Aragon, G. ;
Valladares, F. .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (01) :81-90
[9]   Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden -: analyses of data from a national survey [J].
Berg, Å ;
Gärdenfors, U ;
Hallingbäck, T ;
Norén, M .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2002, 11 (08) :1479-1503
[10]   Nested plant and fungal communities; the importance of area and habitat quality in maximizing species capture in boreal old-growth forests [J].
Berglund, H ;
Jonsson, BG .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 112 (03) :319-328