Patient preferences for expectant management vs. surgical evacuation in first-trimester uncomplicated miscarriage

被引:27
作者
Wieringa-de Waard, M
Bindels, PJE
Vos, J
Bonsel, GJ
Stalmeier, PFM
Ankum, WM
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gen Pract Family Med, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Social Med, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
spontaneous abortion; curettage; randomized controlled trial; treatment outcome; choice behavior; patient satisfaction; decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.004
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Expectant and surgical management are widely accepted treatment options in case of a miscarriage. In the absence of differences in complications, the choice between both options can be based on patient preferences. Study Design and Setting: We studied treatment preferences for future miscarriages in women with a miscarriage randomized to expectant or surgical treatment or managed according to their own choice. Results: Data from 136 patients were analyzed. Women randomized either to expectant or surgical management opted for the allocated treatment in future in 55 and 74%, respectively. Of the women randomized to expectant management and with a successful spontaneous loss, 71% opted again for this treatment. Women who were managed according to their own treatment choice, held on to their initial treatment preference (expectant vs. surgical management; 84 and 88%, respectively). Preferences after treatment were strong. Conclusion: A strong treatment preference should be taken into account in the counseling process. Women without a preference should be well informed on all medical aspects of the two options in order to facilitate informed-shared decision-making. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   PATIENT PREFERENCES AND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BREWIN, CR ;
BRADLEY, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 299 (6694) :313-315
[2]   Incidence and outcome of bleeding before the 20th week of pregnancy: Prospective study from general practice [J].
Everett, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7099) :32-34
[3]   COMPARISON OF MEDICAL ABORTION WITH SURGICAL VACUUM ASPIRATION - WOMENS PREFERENCES AND ACCEPTABILITY OF TREATMENT [J].
HENSHAW, RC ;
NAJI, SA ;
RUSSELL, IT ;
TEMPLETON, AA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6906) :714-717
[4]   PATIENTS WILLINGNESS TO ENTER CLINICAL-TRIALS - MEASURING THE ASSOCIATION WITH PERCEIVED BENEFIT AND PREFERENCE FOR DECISION PARTICIPATION [J].
LLEWELLYNTHOMAS, HA ;
MCGREAL, MJ ;
THIEL, EC ;
FINE, S ;
ERLICHMAN, C .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1991, 32 (01) :35-42
[5]  
Molnar A M, 2000, J Am Board Fam Pract, V13, P333
[6]   EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT OF 1ST-TRIMESTER SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION [J].
NIELSEN, S ;
HAHLIN, M .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8942) :84-86
[7]   Systemic methotrexate therapy versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy. Part II. Patient preferences for systemic methotrexate [J].
Nieuwkerk, PT ;
Hajenius, PJ ;
Van der Veen, F ;
Ankum, WM ;
Wijker, W ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 70 (03) :518-522
[9]   Breast cancer patients attitudes about rationing postlumpectomy radiation therapy: Applicability of trade-off methods to policy-making [J].
Palda, VA ;
LlewellynThomas, HA ;
Mackenzie, RG ;
Pritchard, KI ;
Naylor, CD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (10) :3192-3200
[10]   ACCEPTABILITY OF ABORTION METHODS [J].
ROSEN, AS .
BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 4 (02) :375-390