Prominent R wave in ECG lead V1 predicts improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with or without left bundle branch block

被引:10
|
作者
Bode, Weeranun D. [1 ]
Bode, Michael F. [1 ]
Gettes, Leonard [1 ]
Jensen, Brian C. [1 ]
Mounsey, John P. [1 ]
Chung, Eugene H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Biventricular pacing; QRS morphology; Electrocardiographic criteria; Left ventricular ejection fraction; Left bundle branch block; DEFIBRILLATOR IMPLANTATION TRIAL; CLINICAL-RESPONSE; HEART-FAILURE; MADIT-CRT; CAPTURE; ALGORITHM; CRITERIA; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND QRS morphology on postprocedural ECG indicating posterolateral left ventricular pacing may be predictive of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess whether a positive vector in V-1 and/or negative vector in lead I on the first postprocedural ECG, suggesting posterolateral capture from CRT, correlates with improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who underwent CRT implantation at our institution between April 2008 and December 2011. Biventricular (BiV) paced QRS morphology was defined as R/S >= 1 in V1 and/or R/S <= 1 in lead I. The primary outcome was improvement of LVEF >= 7.5%. The chi(2) and t tests were used for analysis. RESULTS Of 68 patients, 49 (72%) met our BiV paced QRS morphology criteria. Thirty-four of these 49 patients (69%) had improvement in LVEF. Of the 19 patients who did not meet our criteria, 17 (89%) did not have an improvement in LVEF (sensitivity 94%, specificity 53%, chi(2) = 19.04, P < .0001). The average LVEF improvement in patients who met our BiV paced QRS morphology criteria was significantly greater than in those who did not (14.27% vs 2.63%, P = .0001). Preprocedural left bundle branch block was not a predictor of echocardiographic response. CONCLUSION Our results highlight the importance of periprocedurat ECG analysis to optimize response to CRT. Moreover, patients without left bundle branch block still benefited from CRT if they met our BiV paced morphology criteria. This suggests that postprocedural left ventricular activation as reflected on the ECG may supersede the baseline conduction delay.
引用
收藏
页码:2141 / 2147
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] T-Wave Area Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block
    Engels, Elien B.
    Vegh, Eszter M.
    Van Deursen, Caroline J. M.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (02) : 176 - 183
  • [2] Improved septal perfusion after cardiac resynchronization therapy in a patient with left bundle branch block and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction
    Hoyer, Hans X.
    Hacker, Marcus
    Gross, Hagen
    Weiss, Mayo
    Tiling, Reinhold
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (04) : 584 - 586
  • [3] Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with mild to moderately reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Lee, Hon-Chi
    Mulpuru, Siva K.
    Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    Bradley, David J.
    Madhavan, Malini
    Ezzeddine, Omar F. Abou
    Wen, Songnan
    Liddell, Brian W.
    Curran, Caroline
    Li, Chuanwei
    Dasari, Surendra
    Lanza, Ian R.
    Bailey, Kent R.
    Chen, Horng H.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (11) : 2250 - 2259
  • [4] Improved septal perfusion after cardiac resynchronization therapy in a patient with left bundle branch block and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction
    Hagen Gross
    Hans X. Hoyer
    Marcus Hacker
    Mayo Weiss
    Reinhold Tiling
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2006, 13 : 584 - 586
  • [5] Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block
    Guo, Jincun
    Li, Linlin
    Xiao, Guosheng
    Ye, Tao
    Huang, Xinyi
    Meng, Fanqi
    Li, Qiang
    Chen, Simei
    Cai, Binni
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (12) : 1460 - 1468
  • [6] Left ventricular ejection fraction is a determinant of cardiac performance after long-term conduction system pacing in patients with left bundle branch block?
    Ma, Zhu-lin
    Ma, Cheng-ming
    Yang, Yi-heng
    Gao, Lian-jun
    Xia, Yun-long
    Dong, Ying-xue
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [7] Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Huang, Jingjuan
    Qi, Yiding
    Wang, Fei
    Guo, Lina
    Shi, Xuerui
    Wu, Weihua
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Li, Ruogu
    HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (12) : 1783 - 1790
  • [8] Left ventricular performance during triggered left ventricular pacing in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and left bundle branch block
    Witt, Christoffer Tobias
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Nohr, Ellen Aagaard
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 46 (03) : 345 - 351
  • [9] Lead one ratio in left bundle branch block predicts poor cardiac resynchronization therapy response
    Loring, Zak
    Friedman, Daniel J.
    Emerek, Kasper
    Graff, Claus
    Sorensen, Peter L.
    Hansen, Steen M.
    Wieslander, Bjorn
    Ugander, Martin
    Sogaard, Peter
    Atwater, Brett D.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (05): : 503 - 510
  • [10] Strategies to Improve Selection of Patients Without Typical Left Bundle Branch Block for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Salden, Odette A. E.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    van Stipdonk, Antonius M. W.
    Cramer, Maarten J.
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Meine, Mathias
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (02) : 129 - 142