Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study

被引:177
作者
Guo, Liang [1 ]
Crossley, Scott A. [2 ]
McNamara, Danielle S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30312 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
Integrated writing tasks; Independent writing tasks; Computational linguistics; Writing assessment; COH-METRIX; ENGLISH; TASKS; LEARNERS; COHESION; STUDENTS; PROMPTS; TEXT;
D O I
10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study explores whether linguistic features can predict second language writing proficiency in the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL iBT) integrated and independent writing tasks and, if so, whether there are differences and similarities in the two sets of predictive linguistic features. Linguistic features related to lexical sophistication, syntactic complexity, cohesion, and basic text information were investigated in relation to the writing scores for both integrated and independent samples. The results of this study show that linguistic features can be used to significantly predict essay scores in the integrated as well as the independent writing. When comparing across the two writing tasks, there are both similarities and differences in the two sets of predictive features. For instance, lexical sophistication was found to be a significant predictor for both tasks while features such as verbs in 3rd person singular form and semantic similarity were only significant predictors for the integrated task. These findings demonstrate that evaluation of the two writing tasks rely on similar and distinct features, and are at least partially assessed using different linguistic criteria. Implications of these findings for the assessment of second language (L2) writing are also discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 238
页数:21
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, LANGUAGE TESTING
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Assessing Writing
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 1) CD-ROM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, LANG TEST, DOI DOI 10.1177/0265532210378031
[5]  
Attali Y., 2008, RR0819 ETS
[6]  
Attali Y., 2006, J TECHNOLOGY LEARNIN, V4, P1
[7]  
Attali Y., 2013, E RATER PER IN PRESS
[8]  
Attali Y., 2007, Construct Validity of e-rater in Scoring TOEFL Essays
[9]  
Biber D., 2006, U LANGUAGE CORPUS BA
[10]   Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany .
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2010, 9 (01) :2-20