Living Donor Intestinal Transplantation Recipient Outcomes

被引:5
|
作者
Wu, Guosheng [1 ]
Liu, Chaoxu [1 ]
Zhou, Xile [1 ]
Zhao, Long [1 ]
Zhang, Weitong [1 ]
Wang, Mian [2 ]
Zhao, Qingchuan [2 ]
Liang, Tingbo [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Intestinal Transplant Ctr, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fourth Mil Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Sch Med, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Sch Med, Zhejiang Prov Key Lab Pancreat Dis, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Canc Ctr, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
intestinal transplantation; living donor; recipient outcomes; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; SINGLE-CENTER; BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION; EXPERIENCE; REJECTION;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000005659
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To examine outcomes of living-donor intestinal transplant (LDITx) recipients. Background: LDITx is not routinely performed because of surgical risks to the donor and the potential inferior physiologic performance of the segmental graft. However, data on the effectiveness of LDITx are scarce. Design: This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing LDITx between May 1999 and December 2021 in intestinal transplant programs in 2 university-affiliated hospitals in China. Results: Actuarial survival rates were 80%, 72.7%, 66.7% for patient and 72.4%, 63.6%, 60% for graft at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Recipients with >3/6 HLA-matched grafts had superior patient and graft survival rates than those with <= 3/6 HLA-matched grafts (P<0.05). There were 12 deaths among the recipients, with infection being the leading cause (41.7%), followed by rejection (33.3%), surgical complications (16.7%), and others (8.3%). There were 16 graft losses among the recipients, with acute cellular rejection being the predominant cause (37.5%), followed by infection (25%), technical failure (12.5%), chronic rejection (12.5%), and others (12.5%). With an average follow-up of 3.7 (range, 0.6-23) years, the rates of acute and chronic rejection were 35% and 5%, and the rate of cytomegalovirus disease and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease were 5% and 2.5%, respectively. Of the 40 patients, 28 (70%) are currently alive and have achieved enteral autonomy. Conclusions: LDITx is a valuable treatment option for patients with end-stage intestinal failure. Improved immunosuppression, better HLA matching, and shorter cold ischemia times were associated with reduced rates of rejection, viral-mediated infection and improved graft survival.
引用
收藏
页码:E444 / E449
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Living Donor Intestinal Transplantation
    Di Cocco, Pierpaolo
    Martinino, Alessandro
    Pinto, Federico
    Valdepenas III, Benito
    Spaggiari, Mario
    Tzvetanov, Ivo
    Benedetti, Enrico
    GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 53 (03) : 441 - 452
  • [2] Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Dar, Faisal S.
    Khan, Nusrat Y.
    Ali, Rubab
    Khokhar, Hamzah Khawar
    Zia, Haseeb H.
    Bhatti, Abu Bakar H.
    Shah, Najmul H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (03)
  • [3] Living Donor Intestinal Transplantation
    Tzvetanov, Ivo G.
    Tulla, Kiara A.
    D'Amico, Giuseppe
    Benedetti, Enrico
    GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 47 (02) : 369 - +
  • [4] Impact of Donor-Recipient Genetic Relationship on Outcome of Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Ali, Mahmoud Abdelwahab
    Elshobari, Mohamed Morsi
    Salah, Tarek
    Kandeel, Al-Refaey
    Sultan, Ahmad Mohammad
    Elghawalby, Ahmad Nabieh
    Shehta, Ahmed
    Elsayed, Usama
    Fathy, Omar
    Yassen, Amr
    Wahab, Mohamed Abdel
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [5] Expanding Donor Selection and Recipient Indications for Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Moghe, Akshata
    Ganesh, Swaytha
    Humar, Abhinav
    Molinari, Michele
    Jonassaint, Naudia
    CLINICS IN LIVER DISEASE, 2021, 25 (01) : 121 - 135
  • [6] Right Lobe Versus Left Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Donor and Recipient Outcomes
    Acuna, Sergio A.
    Zhang, Wei
    Yoon, Peter D.
    Ivanics, Tommy
    Zhu, Mary P.
    Claasen, Marco
    Zuckerman, Jesse
    Ghanekar, Anand
    Cattral, Mark S.
    Sapisochin, Gonzalo
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (12) : 2370 - 2378
  • [7] Living-donor kidney transplantation:: risks of the donor -: benefits of the recipient
    Weitz, Juergen
    Koch, Moritz
    Mehrabi, Arianeb
    Schemmer, Peter
    Zeier, Martin
    Beimler, Joerg
    Buechler, Markus
    Schmidt, Jan
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 20 : 13 - 16
  • [8] Shipping living donor kidneys and transplant recipient outcomes
    Treat, Eric
    Chow, Eric K. H.
    Peipert, John D.
    Waterman, Amy
    Kwan, Lorna
    Massie, Allan B.
    Thomas, Alvin G.
    Bowring, Mary Grace
    Leeser, David
    Flechner, Stuart
    Melcher, Marc L.
    Kapur, Sandip
    Segev, Dorry L.
    Veale, Jeffrey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 (03) : 632 - 641
  • [9] The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living-donor liver transplantation
    Tajima, Tetsuya
    Hata, Koichiro
    Kusakabe, Jiro
    Miyauchi, Hidetaka
    Yurugi, Kimiko
    Hishida, Rie
    Ogawa, Eri
    Okamoto, Tatsuya
    Sonoda, Mari
    Kageyama, Shoichi
    Zhao, Xiangdong
    Ito, Takashi
    Seo, Satoru
    Okajima, Hideaki
    Nagao, Miki
    Haga, Hironori
    Uemoto, Shinji
    Hatano, Etsuro
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 28 (10) : 1588 - 1602
  • [10] Living donor liver transplantation
    Song, Gi-Won
    Lee, Sung-Gyu
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 19 (03) : 217 - 222