Public response to the Tokai nuclear accident

被引:51
作者
Katsuya, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nucl Safety Syst Inc, Inst Social Res, Fukui 9191205, Japan
关键词
attitude; nuclear power; Tokai accident; Japan; covariance structure analysis;
D O I
10.1111/0272-4332.216172
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This article discusses the influence of the September 30,1999 nuclear accident in Tokai village (Japan) on the public's attitudes toward nuclear power in Japan. The data used in this report were taken from the results of two surveys conducted mainly to measure the attitudes of the Japanese public with regard to the use of nuclear power in Japan. The first survey was done before the accident in District 23 in Tokyo and also in Osaka and Nagoya. The second survey, which took place after the accident in District 23 in Tokyo and in Osaka and Nagoya, also included residents in a number of other cities of various sizes throughout Japan. The results of the two surveys showed that (1) acceptability of and trust in nuclear power operation had decreased, (2) perceived accident likelihood and public interest had significantly increased, and (3) there had been neither significant nor even a small change in the public's self-rated knowledge about nuclear power or their distrust of the government. The results also showed that the ratio of nuclear power generation opponents to total respondents had considerably increased (7% to 23%) whereas nuclear power generation supporters had moderately decreased (1% to 12%).
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1046
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[2]  
Arbuckle J.L., 1999, AMOS 40 USERS GUIDE
[3]   RISK PERCEPTION AND THE LOCATION OF A REPOSITORY FOR SPENT NUCLEAR-FUEL [J].
BIEL, A ;
DAHLSTRAND, U .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 36 (01) :25-36
[4]   ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING MODEL FIT [J].
BROWNE, MW ;
CUDECK, R .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :230-258
[5]   RISK PERCEPTION AND WORRIES AFTER THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT [J].
DROTTZSJOBERG, BM ;
SJOBERG, L .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 10 (02) :135-149
[6]   TRUST AS A DETERMINANT OF OPPOSITION TO A HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE-WASTE REPOSITORY - ANALYSIS OF A STRUCTURAL MODEL [J].
FLYNN, J ;
BURNS, W ;
MERTZ, CK ;
SLOVIC, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1992, 12 (03) :417-429
[7]  
KUMAGAI A, 1995, J ATOM ENERG SOC JPN, V37, P379
[8]   EFFECTS OF THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT ON PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF NUCLEAR-PLANT ACCIDENT RISKS [J].
LINDELL, MK ;
PERRY, RW .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1990, 10 (03) :393-399
[9]   THE STABILITY OF NUCLEAR ATTITUDES AFTER CHERNOBYL [J].
MIDDEN, CJH ;
VERPLANKEN, B .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 10 (02) :111-119
[10]  
NEALY SM, 1983, PUBLIC OPINION NUCL