Separation of encoding fluency and item difficulty effects on judgements of learning

被引:39
作者
Undorf, Monika [1 ]
Erdfelder, Edgar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Sch Social Sci, Dept Psychol, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
Judgements of learning; Encoding fluency; Ease of processing; Metacognitive heuristics; Metamemory; METACOGNITIVE ILLUSIONS; RETRIEVAL FLUENCY; SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE; MEMORY PREDICTIONS; INFORMATION; METAMEMORY; BELIEFS; ROLES; EASE;
D O I
10.1080/17470218.2013.777751
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The fluency of information encoding has frequently been discussed as a major determinant of predicted memory performance indicated by judgements of learning (JOLs). Previous studies established encoding fluency effects on JOLs. However, it is largely unknown whether fluency takes effect above and beyond the effects of item difficulty. We therefore tested whether encoding fluency still affects JOLs when numerous additional cues indicating the difficulty of an item are available as well. In three experiments, participants made JOLs for another participant while observing his or her self-paced study phase. However, study times were swapped in one experimental condition, so that items with short study times (indicating high fluency) were presented for long durations, whereas items with long study times (indicating low fluency) were presented for short durations. Results showed that both item difficulty and encoding fluency affected JOLs. Thus, encoding fluency in itself is indeed an important cue for JOLs that does not become redundant when difficulty information is available in addition. This observation lends considerable support to the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:2060 / 2072
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   The persistence of the fluency-confidence association in problem solving [J].
Ackerman, Rakefet ;
Zalmanov, Hagar .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (06) :1187-1192
[2]   Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation [J].
Alter, Adam L. ;
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2009, 13 (03) :219-235
[3]   MEMORY PREDICTIONS ARE BASED ON EASE OF PROCESSING [J].
BEGG, I ;
DUFT, S ;
LALONDE, P ;
MELNICK, R ;
SANVITO, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1989, 28 (05) :610-632
[4]   The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index [J].
Benjamin, AS ;
Bjork, RA ;
Schwartz, BL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1998, 127 (01) :55-68
[5]   Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory [J].
Busey, TA ;
Tunnicliff, J ;
Loftus, GR ;
Loftus, EF .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2000, 7 (01) :26-48
[6]   What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting [J].
de Groot, AMB ;
Keijzer, R .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2000, 50 (01) :1-56
[7]  
Dunlosky J., 2008, Metacognition
[8]   PSYCHOLINGUISTIC DETERMINANTS OF FOREIGN-LANGUAGE VOCABULARY LEARNING [J].
ELLIS, NC ;
BEATON, A .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 1993, 43 (04) :559-617
[9]   Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control [J].
Finn, Bridgid .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (04) :813-821
[10]  
Hager W., 1994, Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen