Barriers to Mental Health Care Perceived Delivery System Differences

被引:24
作者
Lingley-Pottie, Patricia [1 ]
McGrath, Patrick J. [2 ]
Andreou, Pantelis [3 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Strongest Families Inst, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychol Pediat & Psychiat, Res & Innovat Capital Dist Hlth Author, IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Med Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Halifax, NS, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
accessibility; distance treatment; delivery systems; mental health outcome; self-disclosure; stigma; therapeutic alliance; treatment barriers; visual anonymity; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; FACE-TO-FACE; PARTICIPATION SCALE; ALLIANCE; INTERNET; CHILDREN; PSYCHOTHERAPY; VALIDATION; DEPRESSION; PARENTS;
D O I
10.1097/ANS.0b013e31828077eb
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Treatment barriers have prompted the development of new models of care. Distance delivery systems bridge the access gap, increasing service availability. Understanding differences between systems can inform system improvements. Sixty participants from the Strongest Families telephone intervention for child behavior difficulties participated. Participants completed a questionnaire to explore differences in perceived treatment barriers (Treatment Barriers Index-TBI) and therapeutic processes (eg, therapeutic alliance, self-disclosure, health outcome) between face-to-face versus distance treatment. The TBI scale has strong internal reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.95 [face-to-face]; 0.90 [distance]). Statistically significant differences were found between delivery system TBI mean scores, indicating fewer barriers with distance treatment. Therapeutic process differences between delivery modes suggest enhanced therapeutic alliance and self-disclosure scores with distance treatment. Increased access, convenience, and sense of privacy (visual anonymity) offered by a distance delivery system may provide an enhanced experience for some individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Journal of Mental Health Counseling, DOI [DOI 10.17744/MEHC.28.1.F0H37DJRW89NV6VB, 10.17744/mehc.28.1.f0h37djrw89nv6vb]
[2]   Primary-care patients' expectations and experiences of online cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a qualitative study [J].
Beattie, Angela ;
Shaw, Alison ;
Kaur, Surinder ;
Kessler, David .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2009, 12 (01) :45-59
[3]   Group versus individual phone-based obesity treatment for rural women [J].
Befort, Christie A. ;
Donnelly, Joseph E. ;
Sullivan, Debra K. ;
Ellerbeck, Edward F. ;
Perri, Michael G. .
EATING BEHAVIORS, 2010, 11 (01) :11-17
[4]  
Beldarrain Y., 2006, DISTANCE EDUC, V27, P139, DOI DOI 10.1080/01587910600789498
[5]   Privacy, emotional closeness, and openness in cyberspace [J].
Ben-Ze'ev, A .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2003, 19 (04) :451-467
[6]   Delivering cognitive-behavior therapy for panic disorder with agoraphobia in videoconference [J].
Bouchard, S ;
Paquin, B ;
Payeur, R ;
Allard, M ;
Rivard, V ;
Fournier, T ;
Renaud, P ;
Lapierre, J .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2004, 10 (01) :13-25
[7]   Bringing theory to research on computer-mediated comforting communication [J].
Caplan, Scott E. ;
Turner, Jacob S. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2007, 23 (02) :985-998
[8]   The factor structure of the barriers to treatment participation scale (BTPS): Implications for future barriers scale development [J].
Colonna-Pydyn, Courtney ;
Gjesfjeld, Christopher D. ;
Greeno, Catherine G. .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (06) :563-569
[9]   Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: A discrete choice conjoint experiment [J].
Cunningham, Charles E. ;
Deal, Ken ;
Rimas, Heather ;
Buchanan, Don H. ;
Gold, Michelle ;
Sdao-Jarvie, Katherine ;
Boyle, Michael .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 36 (07) :1123-1138
[10]   Psychotherapy using distance technology: A comparison of face-to-face, video, and audio treatment [J].
Day, SX ;
Schneider, PL .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 49 (04) :499-503