Robotic ileocolic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis for Crohn's disease

被引:25
作者
Aydinli, H. Hande [1 ]
Anderson, Marissa [1 ]
Hambrecht, Amanda [1 ]
Bernstein, Mitchell A. [1 ]
Grucela, Alexis L. [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Univ Langone Hlth, Dept Surg, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, 530 First Ave Suite 7V, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Crohn's disease; Inflammatory bowel disease; LAPAROSCOPIC RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY; ASSISTED RIGHT COLECTOMY; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CLASICC TRIAL; COLON-CANCER; EXTRACORPOREAL; ADVANTAGES;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-020-01125-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The robotic platform can overcome limitations of the laparoscopic approach, particularly in the facilitation of intracorporeal anastomosis creation. We aim to share our institutional experience with robotic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease (CD) and compare it to a laparoscopic cohort. We identified patients who underwent ileocolic resection for CD with a purely robotic (R) or laparoscopic (L) approach between February 2015 and 2018. Chart review was performed and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data was collected. A total of 47 patients with a mean age of 35.2 years old were identified and 61% were female. Seventy percent [n = 33, (23 females, 69.6%)] of the cases were performed robotically and 30% of the cases [n = 14, (6 females, 42.8%)] were performed laparoscopically. The groups were well matched for age, gender, BMI as well as disease related factors (CD duration; clinical classification and location), perioperative immunosuppression, and surgical history. Time to bowel function was shorter by about 1 day in the robotic group (R: 1.9 +/- 0.88 days vs.L: 2.7 +/- 0.8 days,p = 0.003). Mean operative time was longer in the robotic group by 51 min and this difference was significant (p = 0.03), however 30.3% of patients underwent ureteral stent placement, which can account for added time in robotic cases. There were less conversions in the robotic group [R: 1(4.3%) vs. L: 1(7%)], but this was not significant. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. Complication (L: 21.4% vs.R: 15.1%,p = 0.605) and reoperation rates (L: 0% vs.R: 3.03%,p = 0.429) were similar. Robotic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease is as safe and feasible as the laparoscopic approach. This was accomplished with no leaks, major morbidity or mortality and comparable length of stay, with 1 day shorter return of bowel function, and with a lower overall complication rate. The robotic approach offers advantages in Crohn's disease which should be studied further in prospective studies.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 472
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Crohn's disease: A review of treatment options and current research [J].
Bandzar, Sean ;
Gupta, Shabnam ;
Platt, Manu O. .
CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 286 (1-2) :45-52
[2]   Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP [J].
Benlice, Cigdem ;
Aytac, Erman ;
Costedio, Meagan ;
Kessler, Hermann ;
Abbas, Maher A. ;
Remzi, Feza H. ;
Gorgun, Emre .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (03)
[3]   Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery - A randomized trial on short-term outcome [J].
Braga, M ;
Vignali, A ;
Gianotti, L ;
Zuliani, W ;
Radaelli, G ;
Gruarin, P ;
Dellabona, P ;
Di Carlo, V .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (06) :759-766
[4]   Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations [J].
Casillas, Mark A., Jr. ;
Leichtle, Stefan W. ;
Wahl, Wendy L. ;
Lampman, Richard M. ;
Welch, Kathleen B. ;
Wellock, Trisha ;
Madden, Erin B. ;
Cleary, Robert K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 208 (01) :33-40
[5]   Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for obstructing right colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cirocchi, R. ;
Campanile, F. Cesare ;
Di Saverio, S. ;
Popivanov, G. ;
Carlini, L. ;
Pironi, D. ;
Tabola, R. ;
Vettoretto, N. .
JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2017, 154 (06) :387-399
[6]   The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J].
Cleary, Robert K. ;
Mullard, Andrew J. ;
Ferraro, Jane ;
Regenbogen, Scott E. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (03) :1515-1524
[7]   Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery - Preliminary experience [J].
Corcione, F ;
Esposito, C ;
Cuccurullo, D ;
Settembre, A ;
Miranda, N ;
Amato, F ;
Pirozzi, F ;
Caiazzo, P .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (01) :117-119
[8]   Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases [J].
D'Annibale, A ;
Morpurgo, E ;
Fiscon, V ;
Trevisan, P ;
Sovernigo, G ;
Orsini, C ;
Guidolin, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (12) :2162-2168
[9]   A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy [J].
DeNoto, George ;
Rubach, Eugene ;
Ravikumar, Thanjuvar S. .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 16 (06) :551-556
[10]   Robotic Assistance in Right Hemicolectomy: Is There a Role? [J].
deSouza, Ashwin L. ;
Prasad, Leela M. ;
Park, John J. ;
Marecik, Slawomir J. ;
Blumetti, Jennifer ;
Abcarian, Herand .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (07) :1000-1006