Evolution of population genetic structure of the British roe deer by natural and anthropogenic processes (Capreolus capreolus)

被引:18
|
作者
Baker, Karis H. [1 ]
Hoelzel, A. Rus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Sch Biol & Biomed Sci, Durham DH1 3LE, England
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2013年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
Conservation genetics; deer; population bottleneck; population structure; translocation; DNA POLYMORPHISM; FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPE; DIFFERENTIATION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; DISPERSAL; CONSEQUENCES; VARIABILITY; DIVERSITY; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.430
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Human influence typically impacts on natural populations of conservation interest. These interactions are varied and sometimes complex, and may be negative and unintended or associated with conservation and management strategy. Understanding the details of how these interactions influence and are influenced by natural evolutionary processes is essential to the development of effective conservation strategies. In this study, we investigate a species in Britain that has experienced both negative impact through overhunting in historical times and management efforts through culls and translocations. At the same time, there are regional populations that have been less affected by human influence. We use mtDNA and nuclear microsatellite DNA markers to investigate patterns of connectivity and diversity and find multiple insular populations in Britain that probably evolved within the Holocene (when the habitat was free of ice). We identify three concurrent processes. First, surviving indigenous populations show highly provincial patterns of philopatry, maintaining and generating population structure on a small geographic scale. Second, founder populations into habitat extirpated of native populations have expanded, but remained largely insular. Third, introductions into established populations generate some admixture. We discuss the implications for the evolution of diversity of the integration of natural processes with anthropogenic influences on population size and distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 102
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] KYPHOSCOLIOSIS IN A ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS-CAPREOLUS-L)
    MEYER, P
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR JAGDWISSENSCHAFT, 1977, 23 (01): : 50 - 52
  • [32] Atmospheric flash injuries in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)
    Zele, D
    Bidovec, A
    Vengust, G
    ACTA VETERINARIA HUNGARICA, 2006, 54 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [33] FRAGMENTATION OF FOOD IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS-CAPREOLUS)
    HOLISOVA, V
    OBRTEL, R
    KOZENA, I
    FOLIA ZOOLOGICA, 1985, 34 (02) : 101 - 109
  • [34] Ectoparasites on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Samsun, Turkey
    Acici, Mustafa
    Bolukbas, Cenk Soner
    Beyhan, Yunus Emre
    Pekmezci, Gokmen Zafer
    Gurler, Ali Tumay
    Umur, Sinasi
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2012, 36 (04): : 456 - 459
  • [35] Genetic discontinuities in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) coincide with fenced transportation infrastructure
    Hepenstrick, Daniel
    Thiel, Dominik
    Holderegger, Rolf
    Gugerli, Felix
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2012, 13 (07) : 631 - 638
  • [36] DELAYED IMPLANTATION IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS-CAPREOLUS)
    AITKEN, RJ
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND FERTILITY, 1974, 39 (01): : 225 - &
  • [37] Morphology of Haemal Nodes in the Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus)
    Bozkurt, Y. Akaydin
    Kabak, M.
    ANATOMIA HISTOLOGIA EMBRYOLOGIA, 2010, 39 (05) : 456 - 461
  • [38] Cryopreservation of captive roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) semen
    Prieto-Pablos, M. T.
    Sanchez-Calabuig, M. J.
    Hildebrandt, T. B.
    Goeritz, F.
    Ortmann, S.
    Eder, S.
    Santiago-Moreno, J.
    Hermes, R.
    Saragusty, J.
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2016, 86 (03) : 695 - 703
  • [39] Ectoparasites on reintroduced roe deer Capreolus capreolus in Israel
    Wallach, Arlan D.
    Shanas, Uri
    Mumcuoglu, Kosta Y.
    Inbar, Moshe
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2008, 44 (03) : 693 - 696
  • [40] Microsatellite markers for the European Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)
    Fickel, J
    Reinsch, A
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2000, 9 (07) : 994 - 995