Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review

被引:10
作者
Ascef, Bruna de Oliveira [1 ]
Lopes, Ana Carolina de Freitas [1 ]
de Soarez, Patricia Coelho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, Fac Med, Ave Dr Arnaldo,455,Sala 2228, BR-01246903 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Biosimilar pharmaceuticals; Technology assessment; Biomedical; Health policy; Evidence-based decisions; MEDICINES; DEFINITIONS; LANGUAGE; AGENCIES; IMPACT; HTA;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-020-00611-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Health technology assessment (HTA) should provide an assessment of a technology's effects on health and of the related social, economic, organisational and ethical issues. HTA reports on biosimilars can specifically assess their immunogenicity, their extrapolation to one or more conditions, and the risks of interchangeability and substitution. We aimed to complete a scoping review within the context of HTA organisations to synthesise HTA reports on biosimilars and to map the extension, scope and methodological practices. Main body A scoping review methodology was applied. The sources for biosimilars HTA reports were database searches and grey literature from HTA organisation websites up to June 2019. HTA reports of biosimilars were classified as full HTA, mini-HTA or rapid reviews. Data were extracted and recorded on a calibrated predefined data form. We identified 70 HTA reports of biosimilars of 16 biologic products (65.71% in 2015-2018) produced by 13 HTA organisations from 10 countries; 2 full HTAs, 4 mini-HTAs and 64 rapid reviews met the inclusion criteria. Almost all the rapid reviews gave no information regarding any evidence synthesis method and approximately half of the rapid reviews did not appraise the risk of bias of primary studies or the overall quality of evidence. All full-HTAs and mini-HTAs addressed organisational, ethical, social and legal considerations, while these factors were assessed in less than half of the rapid reviews. The immunogenicity and extrapolation of one or more conditions were often considered. The majority of full-HTAs and mini-HTAs contained an assessment of switching and a discussion of an educational approach about biosimilars. No HTA report rejected the adoption/reimbursement of the biosimilar assessed. Conclusion HTA of biosimilars are emerging in the context of HTA organisations and those that exist often duplicate reports of the same biosimilar. Most HTA reports of biosimilars do not conduct a systematic literature review or consider economic issues. No report has rejected the adoption/reimbursement of biosimilars. There is a need to standardise the minimum criteria for the development of HTA on biosimilars to ensure a better understanding and better decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] The effect of new biosimilars in rheumatology and gastroenterology specialities on UK healthcare budgets: Results of a budget impact analysis
    Aladul, Mohammed I.
    Fitzpatrick, Raymond W.
    Chapman, Stephen R.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2019, 15 (03) : 310 - 317
  • [2] Clinical evidence supporting the marketing authorization of biosimilars in Europe
    Allocati, Eleonora
    Bertele', Vittorio
    Gerardi, Chiara
    Garattini, Silvio
    Banzi, Rita
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 76 (04) : 557 - 566
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs)
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, SCI CONS DEM BIOS RE
  • [5] Arksey H., 2005, Int J Soc Res Methodol [Internet], V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [6] Interchangeability and substitution of biosimilars: is health technology assessment (HTA) a tool for decision-making?
    Ascef, Bruna de Oliveira
    Leonel da Silva, Renan Goncalves
    de Oliveira Junior, Haliton Alves
    De Soarez, Patricia Coelho
    [J]. CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 35 (09):
  • [7] Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2018, BIOS REG HLTH TECHN
  • [8] Barriers towards effective pharmacovigilance systems of biosimilars in rheumatology: A Latin American survey
    Castaneda-Hernandez, Gilberto
    Sandoval, Hugo
    Coindreau, Javier
    Felipe Rodriguez-Davison, Luis
    Pineda, Carlos
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 (08) : 1035 - 1044
  • [9] Chamova J., 2017, MAPPING HTA NATL ORG
  • [10] "Biosimilar medicines: Why the science matters": Balanced and reassuring advice for healthcare providers
    de Mora, Fernando
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 137 - 138