Stratifying triple-negative breast cancer prognosis using 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging

被引:20
作者
Yue, Yong [1 ]
Cui, Xiaojiang [2 ]
Bose, Shikha [3 ]
Audeh, William [4 ]
Zhang, Xiao [5 ]
Fraass, Benedick [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[5] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Biostat & Bioinformat Core, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Biomarker; Basal-like Breast Cancer; Imaging; PET/CT; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; F-18-FDG PET/CT; MICROARRAY; BIOMARKERS; CARCINOMA; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-015-3558-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study aims to stratify prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients using pre-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT, alone and with correlation to immunohistochemistry biomarkers. 200 consecutive TNBC breast cancer patients treated between 2008 and 2012 were retrieved. Among the full cohort, 79 patients had pre-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans. Immunostaining status of basal biomarkers (EGFR, CK5/6) and other clinicopathological variables were obtained. Three PET image features were evaluated: maximum uptake values (SUVmax), mean uptake (SUVmean), and metabolic volume (SUVvol) defined by SUV > 2.5. All variables were analyzed versus disease-free survival (DFS) using univariate and multivariate Cox analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests. The optimal cutoff points of variables were estimated using time-dependent survival receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. All PET features significantly correlated with proliferation marker Ki-67 (all p < 0.010). SUVmax stratified the prognosis of TNBC patients with optimal cutoff derived by ROC analysis (a parts per thousand currency sign3.5 vs. > 3.5, AUC = 0.654, p = 0.006). SUVmax and EGFR were significant prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. To integrate prognosis of biological and imaging markers, patients were first stratified by EGFR into low (a parts per thousand currency sign15 %) and high (> 15 %) risk groups. Further, SUVmax was used as a variable to stratify the two EGFR groups. In the high EGFR group, patients with high FDG uptake (SUVmax > 3.5) had worse survival outcome (median DFS = 7.6 months) than those patients with low FDG uptake (SUVmax a parts per thousand currency sign 3.5, median DFS = 11.6 months). In the low EGFR group, high SUVmax also indicated worse survival outcome (17.2 months) than low SUVmax (22.8 months). The risk stratification with integrative EGFR and PET was statistically significant with log-rank p a parts per thousand(a) 0.001. Pre-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging has significant prognostic value for predicting survival outcome of TNBC patients. Integrated with basal-biomarker EGFR, PET imaging can further stratify patient risks in the pre-treatment stage and help select appropriate treatment strategies for individual patients.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 616
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   New time-dependent approach to analyse the prognostic significance of immunohistochemical biomarkers in colon cancer and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [J].
Adams, H. ;
Tzankov, A. ;
Lugli, A. ;
Zlobec, I. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 62 (11) :986-997
[2]   Utility of 18F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer [J].
Aogi, Kenjiro ;
Kadoya, Takayuki ;
Sugawara, Yoshifumi ;
Kiyoto, Sachiko ;
Shigematsu, Hideo ;
Masumoto, Norio ;
Okada, Morihito .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 150 (01) :209-217
[3]   Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose:: Use and limitations [J].
Avril, N ;
Rosé, CA ;
Schelling, M ;
Dose, J ;
Kuhn, W ;
Bense, S ;
Weber, W ;
Ziegler, S ;
Graeff, H ;
Schwaiger, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (20) :3495-3502
[4]   Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose [J].
Avril, N ;
Dose, J ;
Janicke, F ;
Bense, S ;
Ziegler, S ;
Laubenbacher, C ;
Romer, W ;
Pache, H ;
Herz, M ;
Allgayer, B ;
Nathrath, W ;
Graeff, H ;
Schwaiger, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (06) :1848-1857
[5]  
Baselga J., 2010, Cancer Res, V70, p95s
[6]   Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters [J].
Basu, Sandip ;
Chen, Wengen ;
Tchou, Julia ;
Mavi, Ayse ;
Cermik, Tevfik ;
Czerniecki, Brian ;
Schnall, Mitchell ;
Alavi, Abass .
CANCER, 2008, 112 (05) :995-1000
[7]   Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks [J].
Blanche, Paul ;
Dartigues, Jean-Francois ;
Jacqmin-Gadda, Helene .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (30) :5381-5397
[8]   TBCRC 001: Randomized Phase II Study of Cetuximab in Combination With Carboplatin in Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Rugo, Hope S. ;
Marcom, P. Kelly ;
Mayer, Erica L. ;
Esteva, Francisco J. ;
Ma, Cynthia X. ;
Liu, Minetta C. ;
Storniolo, Anna Maria ;
Rimawi, Mothaffar F. ;
Forero-Torres, Andres ;
Wolff, Antonio C. ;
Hobday, Timothy J. ;
Ivanova, Anastasia ;
Chiu, Wing-Keung ;
Ferraro, Madlyn ;
Burrows, Emily ;
Bernard, Philip S. ;
Hoadley, Katherine A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Winer, Eric P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (21) :2615-2623
[9]   Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value then triple-negative phenotype [J].
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Voduc, David ;
Bajdik, Chris ;
Leung, Samuel ;
McKinney, Steven ;
Chia, Stephen K. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (05) :1368-1376
[10]   TNBCtype: A Subtyping Tool for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Li, Jiang ;
Gray, William ;
Lehmann, Brian ;
Bauer, Joshua ;
Shyr, Yu ;
Pietenpol, Jennifer .
CANCER INFORMATICS, 2012, 11 :147-156