The MMPI-2-RF Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5-RF) Scales: Development and Validity Research

被引:28
作者
Harkness, Allan R. [1 ,2 ]
McNulty, John L. [1 ,2 ]
Finn, Jacob A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reynolds, Shannon M. [1 ,2 ]
Shields, Susan M.
Arbisi, Paul [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tulsa, Dept Psychol, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
[2] Univ Tulsa, Inst Biochem & Psychol Study Individual Differenc, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
[3] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kent, OH USA
[4] Minneapolis VA Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychiat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
MODEL; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1080/00223891.2013.823439
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article describes the development, internal psychometric, and external validation studies on scales designed to measure the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) from MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) items. Diverse and comprehensive data sets, representing various clinical and nonclinical populations, were classified into development and validation research samples. Item selection, retention, and exclusion procedures are detailed. The final set of PSY-5-RF scales contain 104 items, with no item overlap between scales (same as the original MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales), and no item overlap with the Demoralization scale. Internal consistency estimates are comparable to the longer MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales. Appropriate convergent and discriminant validity findings utilizing various self-report, collateral rating, and record review data are reported and discussed. A particular emphasis is offered for the unique aspects of the PSY-5 model: psychoticism and disconstraint. The findings are connected to the broader PSY-5 literature and the recommended review of systems (Harkness, Reynolds, & Lilienfeld, this issue) presented in this series of articles.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 150
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] MMPI-2 validity scale characteristics in a correctional sample
    McNulty, JL
    Forbey, JD
    Graham, JR
    Ben-Porath, YS
    Black, MS
    Anderson, SV
    Burlew, AK
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2003, 10 (03) : 288 - 298
  • [32] Millon T., 2000, PERSONALITY DISORDER
  • [33] On the usefulness of measures of normal personality for clinical assessment: Evidence of the incremental validity of the revised NEO personality inventory
    Quirk, SW
    Christiansen, ND
    Wagner, SH
    McNulty, JL
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2003, 15 (03) : 311 - 325
  • [34] A dimensional model of personality disorder:: Incorporating DSM Cluster A characteristics
    Tackett, Jennifer L.
    Silberschmidt, Amy L.
    Krueger, Robert F.
    Sponheim, Scott R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 117 (02) : 454 - 459
  • [35] Tellegen A., 2008, MMPI-2-RF technical manual
  • [36] Tellegen A., 1982, Brief manual for the differential personality questionnaire
  • [37] Comparison of the MMPI-2 personality psychopathology five (PSY-5), the NEO-PI, and the NEO-PI-R
    Trull, TJ
    Useda, JD
    Costa, PT
    McCrae, RR
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (04) : 508 - 516
  • [38] Comparability of Scores on the MMPI-2-RF Scales Generated With the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF Booklets
    Van Der Heijden, P. T.
    Egger, J. I. M.
    Derksen, J. J. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2010, 92 (03) : 254 - 259
  • [39] Structures of Personality and Their Relevance to Psychopathology: II. Further Articulation of a Comprehensive Unified Trait Structure
    Watson, David
    Clark, Lee Anna
    Chmielewski, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2008, 76 (06) : 1545 - 1585
  • [40] Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground
    Widiger, TA
    Simonsen, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2005, 19 (02) : 110 - 130