Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields

被引:59
作者
Jamali, Hamid R. [1 ]
Nabavi, Majid [2 ]
机构
[1] Kharazmi Univ, Fac Psychol & Educ, Dept Lib & Informat Studies, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iranian Res Inst Informat Sci & Technol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Google Scholar; Open access; Full text version; Citation version; Citation number; Scopus subject categories; CITATION ADVANTAGE; SCIENCE; SCOPUS; WEB; COVERAGE; FACULTY; IMPACT; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Google Scholar, a widely used academic search engine, plays a major role in finding free full-text versions of articles. But little is known about the sources of full-text files in Google Scholar. The aim of the study was to find out about the sources of full-text items and to look at subject differences in terms of number of versions, times cited, rate of open access availability and sources of full-text files. Three queries were created for each of 277 minor subject categories of Scopus. The queries were searched in Google Scholar and the first ten hits for each query were analyzed. Citations and patents were excluded from the results and the time frame was limited to 2004-2014. Results showed that 61.1 % of articles were accessible in full-text in Google Scholar; 80.8 % of full-text articles were publisher versions and 69.2 % of full-text articles were PDF. There was a significant difference between the means of times cited of full text items and non-full-text items. The highest rate of full text availability for articles belonged to life science (66.9 %). Publishers' websites were the main source of bibliographic information for non-full-text articles. For full-text articles, educational (edu, ac.xx etc.) and org domains were top two sources of full text files. ResearchGate was the top single website providing full-text files (10.5 % of full-text articles).
引用
收藏
页码:1635 / 1651
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis [J].
Aguillo, Isidro F. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 91 (02) :343-351
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SIZE GOOGLE SCHOLAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Publisher's Weekly
[4]   Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? [J].
Antelman, K .
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2004, 65 (05) :372-382
[5]  
Archambault E., 2013, PROPORTION OPEN ACCE
[6]   Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 74 (02) :257-271
[7]   Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 [J].
Bjork, Bo-Christer ;
Welling, Patrik ;
Laakso, Mikael ;
Majlender, Peter ;
Hedlund, Turid ;
Guonason, Guoni .
PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (06)
[8]  
Brown C, 2001, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V52, P187, DOI 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1586>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-D
[10]  
Christianson M., 2007, ISSUES SCI TECHNOL, DOI [10.5062/F4MS3QPD, DOI 10.5062/F4MS3QPD]