An application of the Kriging method in global sensitivity analysis with parameter uncertainty

被引:104
作者
Wang, Pan [1 ]
Lu, Zhenzhou [1 ]
Tang, Zhangchun [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Aeronaut, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Epistemic and aleatory uncertainties; Failure probability; Variance based sensitivity measure; Kriging method; Sobol's method; DESIGN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.019
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
For structural systems with both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties, the effect of epistemic uncertainty on failure probability is measured by the variance based sensitivity analysis, which generally needs a "triple-loop" crude sampling procedure to solve and is time consuming. Thus, the Kriging method is employed to avoid the complex sampling procedure and improve the computational efficiency. By utilizing the Kriging predictor model, the conditional expectation of failure probability on the given epistemic uncertainty can be calculated efficiently. Compared with the Sobol's method, the proposed one can ensure reasonable accuracy of results but with lower computational cost. Three examples are employed to demonstrate the reasonability and efficiency of the proposed method. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6543 / 6555
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, HDB STAT
[2]   Measuring uncertainty importance: Investigation and comparison of alternative approaches [J].
Borgonovo, Emanuele .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (05) :1349-1361
[3]   Precision design of roll-forging die and its application in the forming of automobile front axles [J].
Cai, ZY .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 168 (01) :95-101
[4]  
Chun M. H., 2009, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V94, P596, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RESS.2008.06.016
[5]   Application of low-discrepancy sampling method in structural reliability analysis [J].
Dai, Hongzhe ;
Wang, Wei .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2009, 31 (01) :55-64
[6]   AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation [J].
Echard, B. ;
Gayton, N. ;
Lemaire, M. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2011, 33 (02) :145-154
[7]   Local and global sensitivity analysis for a reactor design with parameter uncertainty [J].
Haaker, MPR ;
Verheijen, PJT .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2004, 82 (A5) :591-598
[8]   Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis [J].
Helton, J. C. ;
Johnson, J. D. ;
Sallaberry, C. J. ;
Storlie, C. B. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2006, 91 (10-11) :1175-1209
[9]   An approximate epistemic uncertainty analysis approach in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties [J].
Hofer, E ;
Kloos, M ;
Krzykacz-Hausmann, B ;
Peschke, J ;
Woltereck, M .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 77 (03) :229-238
[10]   Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models [J].
Homma, T ;
Saltelli, A .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 52 (01) :1-17