Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Interventional Pain Procedures

被引:3
|
作者
Kamath, Dilip [1 ]
Mcintyre, Sean [2 ]
Peskin, Evan [1 ]
Stratman, Scott [3 ]
Agarwal, Nitin [4 ]
Kamath, Preetha D. [5 ]
Gupta, Raghav [6 ]
Schwartz, Ruben [7 ]
Abd-Elsayed, Alaa [8 ]
Urits, Ivan [9 ]
Viswanath, Omar [10 ]
Kaye, Alan D. [11 ]
Horn, Danielle B. [12 ]
机构
[1] Jackson Mem Hosp, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Herbert Werthe Coll Med, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Neurosurg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dermatol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[6] Rutgers State Univ, Neurosurg, Newark, NJ USA
[7] Mt Sinai Med Ctr Florida, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Madison, WI USA
[9] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[10] Valley Pain Consultants Envis Phys Serv, Pain Management, Phoenix, AZ USA
[11] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Anesthesiol, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[12] Jackson Mem Hosp, Pain Management, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
readability; HEALTH LITERACY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.10684
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The internet has had an enormous influence on the field of medicine. In this regard, Statista, a market and consumer data company, estimated in 2019 that more than half the world's population (>four billion people) were active internet users. Accessing the World Wide Web has become the second nature for most. In the medical field, many patients look to the internet for information regarding certain procedures. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to assess the readability level of more than 492 online sources with information on a wide array of interventional pain procedures. Objective The aim is to determine the readability of online patient educational materials for interventional pain procedures. Study design This is a retrospective review. Methods We downloaded and reformatted to plain text 492 internet-based patient educational materials for 17 different interventional pain procedures. Plain text was processed using Readability Studio (Oleander Software Ltd., Vandalia, Ohio, USA), which employs 10 quantitative readability scales that are widely used and accepted in the medical literature. Results The software determined the average reading level (or grade level) of the 492 online sources we examined to be 12.1, with a range of 10.9 to 13. Limitations Google is not the only online search engine patients utilize for information, and the top links for each search could change over time. Also, some patients prefer videos rather than text to learn about their disease and treatment options. Finally, depending on their provider, the links that patients are directed to may be significantly more or less readable. Conclusions The average American adult reads at the eighth grade level. The National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association have recommended education materials be made available at the third to seventh grade level. Our analysis shows patient educational materials found online for interventional pain procedures to be overly technical, with an average reading level (or grade level) of 12.1.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating the readability of online patient education materials on skin care in Mpox
    Nusynowitz, Jake
    Gessner, Nicholas
    Leslie, Kieron S.
    Trinidad, John C.
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 317 (01)
  • [42] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials on Adult Reconstruction Web Sites
    Polishchuk, Daniil L.
    Hashem, Jenifer
    Sabharwal, Sanjeev
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (05) : 716 - 719
  • [43] Revisiting the Readability of Online Patient Information in Interventional Radiology
    Rahmani, George
    O'Sullivan, Gerard J. J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (06) : 809 - 810
  • [44] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Adam Timothy Lucy
    Stephanie L. Rakestraw
    Courtney Stringer
    Daniel Chu
    Jayleen Grams
    Richard Stahl
    Margaux N. Mustian
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6519 - 6525
  • [45] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Lucy, Adam Timothy
    Rakestraw, Stephanie L. L.
    Stringer, Courtney
    Chu, Daniel
    Grams, Jayleen
    Stahl, Richard
    Mustian, Margaux N. N.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (08): : 6519 - 6525
  • [46] Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery
    Chang, Michelle
    Weiss, Barry
    Worrell, Stephanie
    Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
    Ghaderi, Iman
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (09): : 5259 - 5265
  • [47] The readability of online Canadian radiotherapy patient educational materials
    Al Balushi, Mustafa
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Debenham, Brock
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2020, 51 (04) : 617 - 623
  • [48] Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Surgical Treatments of the Spine
    Phan, Amy
    Jubril, Ayodeji
    Menga, Emmanuel
    Mesfin, Addisu
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : E583 - E588
  • [49] Assessment of the Readability of the Online Patient Education Materials of Intensive and Critical Care Societies
    Hanci, Volkan
    Otlu, Buesra
    Biyikoglu, Ali Salih
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (02) : e47 - e57
  • [50] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Graft-Versus-Host Disease
    Trisha Kaundinya
    Salma El-Behaedi
    Jennifer N. Choi
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2023, 38 : 1363 - 1366