Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Interventional Pain Procedures

被引:3
|
作者
Kamath, Dilip [1 ]
Mcintyre, Sean [2 ]
Peskin, Evan [1 ]
Stratman, Scott [3 ]
Agarwal, Nitin [4 ]
Kamath, Preetha D. [5 ]
Gupta, Raghav [6 ]
Schwartz, Ruben [7 ]
Abd-Elsayed, Alaa [8 ]
Urits, Ivan [9 ]
Viswanath, Omar [10 ]
Kaye, Alan D. [11 ]
Horn, Danielle B. [12 ]
机构
[1] Jackson Mem Hosp, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Herbert Werthe Coll Med, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Neurosurg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dermatol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[6] Rutgers State Univ, Neurosurg, Newark, NJ USA
[7] Mt Sinai Med Ctr Florida, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Madison, WI USA
[9] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[10] Valley Pain Consultants Envis Phys Serv, Pain Management, Phoenix, AZ USA
[11] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Anesthesiol, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[12] Jackson Mem Hosp, Pain Management, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
readability; HEALTH LITERACY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.10684
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The internet has had an enormous influence on the field of medicine. In this regard, Statista, a market and consumer data company, estimated in 2019 that more than half the world's population (>four billion people) were active internet users. Accessing the World Wide Web has become the second nature for most. In the medical field, many patients look to the internet for information regarding certain procedures. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to assess the readability level of more than 492 online sources with information on a wide array of interventional pain procedures. Objective The aim is to determine the readability of online patient educational materials for interventional pain procedures. Study design This is a retrospective review. Methods We downloaded and reformatted to plain text 492 internet-based patient educational materials for 17 different interventional pain procedures. Plain text was processed using Readability Studio (Oleander Software Ltd., Vandalia, Ohio, USA), which employs 10 quantitative readability scales that are widely used and accepted in the medical literature. Results The software determined the average reading level (or grade level) of the 492 online sources we examined to be 12.1, with a range of 10.9 to 13. Limitations Google is not the only online search engine patients utilize for information, and the top links for each search could change over time. Also, some patients prefer videos rather than text to learn about their disease and treatment options. Finally, depending on their provider, the links that patients are directed to may be significantly more or less readable. Conclusions The average American adult reads at the eighth grade level. The National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association have recommended education materials be made available at the third to seventh grade level. Our analysis shows patient educational materials found online for interventional pain procedures to be overly technical, with an average reading level (or grade level) of 12.1.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Readability, understandability, and actionability of online patient education materials for sunscreen
    Sarah J. Shareef
    Rafey Rehman
    Mahfujul Z. Haque
    Jonathan I. Silverberg
    Archives of Dermatological Research, 2023, 315 : 677 - 681
  • [32] Readability of online patient education materials for Merkel cell carcinoma
    Yue Zhang
    Catherine C. Nguyen
    Karl Y. Bilimoria
    Ryan P. Merkow
    Archives of Dermatological Research, 2023, 315 : 629 - 632
  • [33] Readability of online patient education materials for shoulder instability surgery in English and Spanish
    Ghahremani, Jacob S.
    Ogi, Jenna E.
    Kody, Michael T.
    Navarro, Ronald A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (10) : 2220 - 2229
  • [34] Readability of Online Spine Patient Education Resources
    Luciani, A. Michael
    Foster, Brian K.
    Hayes, Daniel
    DelSole, Edward M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : E640 - E644
  • [35] Availability and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Regarding Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Perioperative Pain Management
    Kumar, Gunjan
    Howard, Steven K.
    Kou, Alex
    Kim, T. Edward
    Butwick, Alexander J.
    Mariano, Edward R.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2017, 18 (10) : 2027 - 2032
  • [36] Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen
    Sax, Leah
    Razak, Alina
    Shetty, Kunal
    Cohen, Michael
    Levi, Jessica
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 125 : 168 - 174
  • [37] A READABILITY COMPARISON OF ONLINE SPANISH AND ENGLISH PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS ABOUT VISION HEALTH
    Karthik, Naveen
    Barekatain, Kayvan
    Vu, Hoang
    Wu, Danny T. Y.
    Ehrlich, Joshua R.
    OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (02) : 182 - 188
  • [38] Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials Concerning Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Venosa, Michele
    Cerciello, Simone
    Zoubi, Mohammad
    Petralia, Giuseppe
    Vespasiani, Andrea
    Angelozzi, Massimo
    Romanini, Emilio
    Logroscino, Giandomenico
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [39] Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
    Cohen, Samuel A.
    Fisher, Ann Caroline
    Pershing, Suzann
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 : 779 - 788
  • [40] Readability of Hospital Online Patient Education Materials Across Otolaryngology Specialties
    Warrier, Akshay
    Singh, Rohan P.
    Haleem, Afash
    Lee, Andrew
    Mothy, David
    Patel, Aakash
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Manzi, Brian
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2025, 10 (01):