Offshore wind turbine monopile foundations: Design perspectives

被引:73
作者
Gupta, Bipin K. [1 ]
Basu, Dipanjan [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kanpur, Dept Civil Engn, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
Offshore wind turbine; Monopile; Analysis; Viscoelastic soil; Nonlinear elastic soil; Design; STIFF PILES; PIERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107514
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Perspectives on design of offshore wind turbine (OWT) monopile foundations are provided in this paper by logically adopting optimal analysis choices with a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. A newly developed analysis framework is used for this purpose. The analysis framework consists of dynamic analysis with linear viscoelastic soil and static analysis with nonlinear elastic soil. The framework is used to show that the Timoshenko beam theory produces most accurate monopile response although the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory produces optimal results maintaining a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. The rigid beam theory can be used only under very restricted soil and monopile conditions. The analysis further demonstrates that static analysis is sufficient and optimal in producing monopile-soil stiffness values that can be used for determining the natural frequency of vibration of the OWTs. Moreover, nonlinear elastic analysis is sufficiently accurate and quick to produce monopile responses that can be used in design and there is no need for elasto-plastic analysis. The aspect of cyclic degradation of soil stiffness over the design life of monopiles is not considered. Thus, an optimal pathway for monopile design is described using the newly developed analysis framework and demonstrated through a design example.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   3D FEM approach for laterally loaded monopile design [J].
Murphy, Gerry ;
Igoe, David ;
Doherty, P. ;
Gavin, K. .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2018, 100 :76-83
[42]   Elastodynamic model for large-diameter end-bearing shafts [J].
Mylonakis, G .
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2001, 41 (03) :31-44
[43]   SOIL-PILE INTERACTION IN HORIZONTAL VIBRATION [J].
NOVAK, M ;
NOGAMI, T .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1977, 5 (03) :263-281
[44]   Stiffness of sands through a laboratory test database [J].
Oztoprak, S. ;
Bolton, M. D. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2013, 63 (01) :54-70
[45]  
Poulos HG., 1980, Pile foundation analysis and design
[46]   THE RESPONSE OF FLEXIBLE PILES TO LATERAL LOADING [J].
RANDOLPH, MF .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1981, 31 (02) :247-259
[47]  
Reese L.C., 1975, J GEOTECH ENG DIV, V101, P633
[48]  
Reese L.C., 1974, Proceedings of Sixth Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, P473, DOI DOI 10.4043/2080-MS
[49]   Dynamic stiffness of monopiles supporting offshore wind turbine generators [J].
Shadlou, Masoud ;
Bhattacharya, Subhamoy .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 88 :15-32
[50]  
Sorensen S.P. H., 2010, The European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, P907, DOI DOI 10.1201/B10551-166