Are housing property rights important for fertility outcomes in China? Empirical evidence and policy issues

被引:10
作者
Hong Liu [1 ]
Gao Yuhang [2 ]
Tisdell, Clement A. [3 ]
Wang Fei [1 ]
机构
[1] Minzu Univ China, Econ Sch, 27 Zhongguancun,South Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Minzu Univ China, 27 Zhongguancun,South Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Econ, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
China; China's economic transformation; Fertility rates; Home ownership grants; Housing property rights; Two Child Policy; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2020.01.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This is the first econometric study of the impact of housing property rights on family fertility in China. It is important policy-wise because China's government wants to raise China's birth rate. This analysis is based on relevant samples drawn from the 2016 China Family Survey and utilizes linear probability, Probit and two-stage least square models. Having housing property rights is found to have a statistically significant positive influence on fertility in China. This result is consistent with most research results for other countries. Other significant influences on fertility include income levels, the sex of respondents, age, whether they are employed, their health and level of education. Furthermore, it is found (in China) that if the first-born child is a boy, parents are less likely to have a second child; and that rural families have substantially more children than urban ones. These features (as observed in the literature) are common in patriarchal societies and in developing ones. It is argued that China's economic reforms and structural economic change (especially rapid urbanization) have led to a substantial reduction in its birth rate. Given our research results, it is unlikely that the cessation of China's 'One Child' policy will in itself result in a sizeable rise in its fertility rate. Nevertheless, given our findings, public policies facilitating the purchase of housing by first-home buyers should contribute positively to China's fertility rate. (c) 2020 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 223
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Aksoy CG, 2016, 192 EBRD, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2846173, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2846173]
[2]  
Chen S., 2016, NW POPUL J, V37, P1, DOI [10.15884/j.cnki.issn.1007-0672.2016.01.001, DOI 10.15884/J.CNKI.ISSN.1007-0672.2016.01.001]
[3]   RETURN OF THE MISSING DAUGHTERS [J].
Das Gupta, Monoca .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2017, 317 (03) :80-85
[4]   House prices and birth rates: The impact of the real estate market on the decision to have a baby [J].
Dettling, Lisa J. ;
Kearney, Melissa S. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2014, 110 :82-100
[5]  
ENSTROM O, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P2137, DOI DOI 10.1177/0042098011427185
[6]  
Ge Y., 2019, POPULATION RES, V43, P52
[7]  
HAURIN DR, 2005, IMPACT HOUSE PRICE A
[8]  
He D., 2018, Population Research, V42, P35
[9]   Housing price, elderly dependency and fertility behaviour [J].
Hui, Eddie C. M. ;
Zheng, Xian ;
Hu, Jiang .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 36 (02) :304-311
[10]  
Jin W., 2018, FINANC TRADE EC, V39, P130