The Reliability and Patient Acceptability of the SmartTrack Device: A New Electronic Monitor and Reminder Device for Metered Dose Inhalers

被引:55
作者
Foster, Juliet M. [1 ]
Smith, Lorraine [2 ]
Usherwood, Tim [3 ]
Sawyer, Susan M. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Rand, Cynthia S. [7 ]
Reddel, Helen K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Clin Management, Woolcock Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Pharm, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Dept Gen Practice, Sydney Med Sch Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[4] Royal Childrens Hosp Melbourne, Ctr Adolescent Hlth, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[6] Royal Childrens Hosp, Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
adherence; electronic medication monitoring; materials testing; metered-dose inhaler; patient compliance; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; SELF-REPORT; ASTHMA;
D O I
10.3109/02770903.2012.684253
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective: The SmartTrack (ST) is a new adherence monitoring device for pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI), with remote upload and ringtone reminder capabilities. Our aim was to assess its reliability and patient acceptability. Methods: Baseline Quality Control (QC): Actuation log accuracy and device functionality tests were undertaken. Simulated Patient Use: Salmeterol/fluticasone inhalers with STs were actuated two times twice daily for 48 h. Accuracy of reminders, data logging, and uploads was tested. Patient Field Testing: Devices were quality tested before dispensing. Asthma patients each field-tested one ST for 7 days and recorded actuations in a diary. Uploaded data were compared to pMDI dose counter and patient diaries. Patient-reported ease of use for the ST was recorded. Results: Baseline QC: 9/10 devices had 100% accuracy; one had an electrical circuit failure. Simulated Patient Use: Accuracy was 99% (2/342 actuations duplicated). Patient Field Testing: One device failed pre-dispensing testing (electrical circuit failure). Eight devices were field-tested by asthma patients (mean age 45, 5 females). Mean actuation log accuracy was 97%. Reminders were 100% accurate. All devices successfully uploaded data. Average patient-rated difficulty of use was 6/100 (1 = extremely easy, 100 = extremely difficult). Conclusions: The ST has acceptable reliability and utility comparable to other electronic monitoring devices. Its remote data upload capability, reminder functions for missed doses, and graphical display of medication use for patient-and physician-feedback are useful additional features.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 662
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[11]  
PricewaterhouseCoopers' Health Research Institute, 2010, HEALTHC UNW NEW BUS
[12]   Electronic monitoring of medication adherence: When is high-tech best? [J].
Riekert, KA ;
Rand, CS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2002, 9 (01) :25-34
[13]   Validation of the Doser, a new device for monitoring metered-dose inhaler use [J].
Simmons, MS ;
Nides, MA ;
Kleerup, EC ;
Chapman, KR ;
Milgrom, H ;
Rand, CS ;
Spector, SL ;
Tashkin, DP .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 102 (03) :409-413
[14]   Microelectronic adherence monitors for metered-dose inhalers: Who monitors the monitors? [J].
Tashkin, DP .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 104 (01) :22-24
[15]   Feasibility and acceptability of using bronchial hyperresponsiveness to manage asthma in primary care: a pilot study [J].
Turton, James A. ;
Glasgow, Nicholas J. ;
Brannan, John D. .
PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (01) :28-34
[16]   Reliability of the Model MC-311 MDI Chronolog [J].
Wamboldt, FS ;
Bender, BG ;
O'Connor, SL ;
Gavin, LA ;
Wamboldt, MZ ;
Milgrom, H ;
Szefler, SJ ;
Iklé, D ;
Rand, C .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 104 (01) :53-57
[17]   Relationship between adherence to inhaled corticosteroids and poor outcomes among adults with asthma [J].
Williams, LK ;
Pladevall, M ;
Xi, H ;
Peterson, EL ;
Joseph, C ;
Lafata, JE ;
Ownby, DR ;
Johnson, CC .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 114 (06) :1288-1293