Diagnostic value of HE4 for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

被引:47
|
作者
Yu, Shuang [1 ]
Yang, Hui-jie [1 ]
Xie, Shu-qin [1 ]
Bao, Yi-Xi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Clin Lab, Chongqing 400010, Peoples R China
关键词
biomarkers; diagnosis; HE4; meta-analysis; ovarian cancer; EPIDIDYMIS PROTEIN 4; SERUM TUMOR BIOMARKER; PELVIC MASS; MARKERS; CA125; CARCINOMA; MULTIPLE; UTILITY; CA-125; WFDC2;
D O I
10.1515/cclm-2011-0477
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the second most common gynecological cancer and the first cause of death from gynecological malignancy in Western Europe and the USA. While human epididymis-specific protein 4 (HE4) has been reported as a predictive diagnostic index, it has not been widely accepted because of inconsistent conclusions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of HE4 systematically for ovarian cancer. Methods: All relevant original studies about HE4 in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer published from January 1974 to May 2011 were retrieved. By measuring methodological qualities, 12 papers were selected for this study, while 531 articles were searched. The overall diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of HE4 for ovarian cancer using the Meta-DiSc statistical software. Results: There were 2607 subjects included in this meta-analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, LR+ and LR- (95% confidence interval) of HE4 was 0.800 (0.770-0.827), 0.916 (0.902-0.929), 10.271 (6.982-15.109) and 0.228 (0.181-0.287), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve of HE4 was 0.946. The index of Q* was 0.885. Conclusions: HE4 was found to be better than CA 125 as an auxiliary indicator for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in terms of better sensitivity, specificity, LR+ and LR-.
引用
收藏
页码:1439 / 1446
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic value of HE4 in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
    Huang, Jinbing
    Chen, Junying
    Huang, Qiaoqiao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 231 : 35 - 42
  • [2] Diagnostic value of serum HE4 in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yachun Bie
    Zhenyu Zhang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 12
  • [3] Diagnostic value of serum HE4 in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis
    Bie, Yachun
    Zhang, Zhenyu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 12
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of urine HE4 in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
    Jia, Meng-Meng
    Deng, Jie
    Cheng, Xiao-lin
    Yan, Zhen
    Li, Qing-Chun
    Xing, Ying-Ying
    Fan, Dong-Mei
    Tian, Xiao-Yu
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (06) : 9660 - 9671
  • [5] The Diagnostic Accuracy of HE4 in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Cheng, Daye
    Sun, Ying
    He, Hu
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2015, 2015
  • [6] Diagnostic Value of Serum Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) in Ovarian Carcinoma A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Li
    Dai, Zhi-Yuan
    Qian, Yong-Hong
    Shi, Yan
    Liu, Feng-Ju
    Yang, Chen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 (07) : 1106 - 1112
  • [7] Meta-analysis of the value of CA125 combined with HE4 in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer
    Yang, Weiwei
    Ding, Yiling
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2024, 136 : S395 - S395
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4, CA125 and ROMA in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Jiwen
    Gao, Jia
    Yao, Hongwen
    Wu, Zongyong
    Wang, Minjie
    Qi, Jun
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (06) : 6127 - 6138
  • [9] Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of HE4 for endometrial carcinoma
    Liu, Jing
    Han, LiLi
    Sun, Qi
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Niyazi, Mayinuer
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 252 : 404 - 411
  • [10] HE4 expression in lung cancer, a meta-analysis
    Zhong, Hai
    Qian, Yingying
    Fang, Surong
    Yang, Linfei
    Li, Lingzhi
    Gu, Wei
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2017, 470 : 109 - 114