Source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols in Brisbane (Australia) by receptor modelling

被引:91
|
作者
Chan, YC [1 ]
Simpson, RW
Mctainsh, GH
Vowles, PD
Cohen, DD
Bailey, GM
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Australian Environm Studies, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Australian Nucl Sci & Technol Org, Div Phys, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
关键词
urban PM2.5 and PM10; chemical mass balance; target transformation factor analysis; multiple linear regression; motor vehicle exhausts;
D O I
10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00090-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aerosol samples for PM2.5 and PM10 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 and 10 mu m, respectively) were collected from 1993 to 1995 at five sites in Brisbane, a subtropical coastal city in Australia. This paper investigates the contributions of emission sources to PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol mass in Brisbane. Source apportionment results derived from the chemical mass balance (CMB), target transformation factor analysis (TTFA) and multiple linear regression (MLR) methods agree well with each other. The contributions from emission sources exhibit large variations in particle size with temporal and spatial differences. On average, the major contributors of PM,, aerosol mass in Brisbane include: soil/road side dusts (25% by mass), motor vehicle exhausts (13%, not including the secondary products), sea salt (12%), Ca-rich and Ti-rich compounds (11%, from cement works and mineral processing industries), biomass burning (7%), and elemental carbon and secondary products contribute to around 15% of the aerosol mass on average. The major sources of PM2.5 aerosols at the Griffith University (GU) site (a suburban site surrounded by forest area) are: elemental carbon (24% by mass), secondary organics (21%), biomass burning (15%) and secondary sulphate (14%). Most of the secondary products are related to motor vehicle exhausts, so, although motor vehicle exhausts contribute directly to only 6% of the PM2.5 aerosol mass, their total contribution (including their secondary products) could be substantial, This pattern of source contribution is similar to the results for Rozelle (Sydney) among the major Australian studies, and is less in contributions from industrial and motor vehicular exhausts than the other cities. An attempt was made to estimate the contribution of rural dust and road side dust, The results show that road side dusts could contribute more than half of the crustal matter. More than 80% of the contribution of vehicle exhausts arises from diesel-fuelled trucks/buses. Biomass burning, large contributions of crustal matter, and/or local contributing sources under calm weather conditions, are often the cause of the high PM10 episodes at the GU site in Brisbane. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3251 / 3268
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characterization of chemical species in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols in Hong kong
    Ho, KF
    Lee, SC
    Chan, CK
    Yu, JC
    Chow, JC
    Yao, XH
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [32] Chemical composition and sources of PM10 and PM2.5 aerosols in Guangzhou, China
    Wang, Xinhua
    Bi, Xinhui
    Sheng, Guoying
    Fu, Jiamo
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 119 (1-3) : 425 - 439
  • [33] Carbonaceous species in PM2.5 and PM10 in urban area of Zhengzhou in China: Seasonal variations and source apportionment
    Wang, Qun
    Jiang, Nan
    Yin, Shasha
    Li, Xiao
    Yu, Fei
    Guo, Yue
    Zhang, Ruiqin
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2017, 191 : 1 - 11
  • [34] Low Molecular Weight Monocarboxylic Acids in PM2.5 and PM10: Quantification, Seasonal Variation and Source Apportionment
    Verma, Nidhi
    Satsangi, Aparna
    Lakhani, Anita
    Kumari, K. Maharaj
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (02) : 485 - 498
  • [35] Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 in the metropolitan area of Costa Rica, Central America
    Herrera Murillo, Jorge
    Rodriguez Roman, Susana
    Rojas Marin, Jose Felix
    Campos Ramos, Arturo
    Blanco Jimenez, Salvador
    Cardenas Gonzalez, Beatriz
    Gibson Baumgardner, Darrel
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2013, 4 (02) : 181 - 190
  • [36] Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 at multiple sites in the strait of Gibraltar by PMF: impact of shipping emissions
    Pandolfi, Marco
    Gonzalez-Castanedo, Yolanda
    Alastuey, Andres
    de la Rosa, Jesus D.
    Mantilla, Enrique
    Sanchez de la Campa, A.
    Querol, Xavier
    Pey, Jorge
    Amato, Fulvio
    Moreno, Teresa
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2011, 18 (02) : 260 - 269
  • [37] Source apportionment of visual impairment during the California regional PM10/PM2.5 air quality study
    Chen, Jianjun
    Ying, Qi
    Kleeman, Michael J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (39) : 6136 - 6144
  • [38] Characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 in a Mountain Valley: seasonal variations, morphology, and elemental composition
    Nautiyal, Shyam Narayan
    Joshi, Veena
    Gautam, Alok Sagar
    Kumar, Ranjit
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Singh, Karan
    Gautam, Sneha
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 2025, 82 (01)
  • [39] Investigation of Desert Dust Contribution to Source Apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 from a Southern Mediterranean Coast
    Kchih, Hassen
    Perrino, Cinzia
    Cherif, Semia
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2015, 15 (02) : 454 - 464
  • [40] Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 air pollution, and possible impacts of study characteristics in South Korea
    Ryou, Hyoung Gon
    Heo, Jongbae
    Kim, Sun-Young
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2018, 240 : 963 - 972