Measurement of functional task difficulty during motor learning: What level of difficulty corresponds to the optimal challenge point?

被引:53
作者
Akizuki, Kazunori [1 ]
Ohashi, Yukari [2 ]
机构
[1] Mejiro Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Iwatsuki Ku, Saitama, Saitama 3398501, Japan
[2] Ibaraki Prefectural Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Ami, Ibaraki 3000394, Japan
关键词
Challenge point framework; Optimal challenge point; Task difficulty; Salivary alpha-amylase; NASA-TIX; Motor learning; SALIVARY ALPHA-AMYLASE; ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD; CARDIOVASCULAR ASSESSMENT; SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD; ATTENTIONAL DEMANDS; MENTAL WORKLOAD; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.humov.2015.07.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The relationship between task difficulty and learning benefit was examined, as was the measurability of task difficulty. Participants were required to learn a postural control task on an unstable surface at one of four different task difficulty levels. Results from the retention test showed an inverted-U relationship between task difficulty during acquisition and motor learning. The second-highest level of task difficulty was the most effective for motor learning, while learning was delayed at the most and least difficult levels. Additionally, the results indicate that salivary a-amylase and the performance dimension of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) are useful indices of task difficulty. Our findings suggested that instructors may be able to adjust task difficulty based on salivary alpha-amylase and the performance dimension of the NASA-TLX to enhance learning. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 117
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ABERNETHY B, 1988, J HUM MOVEMENT STUD, V14, P101
[2]   Salivary α-Amylase Reflects Change in Attentional Demands During Postural Control: Comparison With Probe Reaction Time [J].
Akizuki, Kazunori ;
Ohashi, Yukari .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2014, 85 (04) :502-508
[3]   Anaerobic Threshold and Salivary α-amylase during Incremental Exercise [J].
Akizuki, Kazunori ;
Yazaki, Syouichirou ;
Echizenya, Yuki ;
Ohashi, Yukari .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2014, 26 (07) :1059-1063
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, ADV PSYCHOL, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62382-1, 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62382-1]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, P HUMAN FACTORS SOC, DOI [10.1177/154193128803200232, DOI 10.1177/154193128803200232]
[6]  
Arnold BL, 1998, J ATHL TRAINING, V33, P323
[7]   The use of autonomic components to improve cardiovascular assessment of mental workload in flight simulation [J].
Backs, RW ;
Lenneman, JK ;
Sicard, JL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :33-47
[8]   PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES OF WORKLOAD DURING CONTINUOUS MANUAL PERFORMANCE [J].
BACKS, RW ;
RYAN, AM ;
WILSON, GF .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1994, 36 (03) :514-531
[9]   Going beyond heart rate: Autonomic space and cardiovascular assessment of mental workload [J].
Backs, RW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 5 (01) :25-48
[10]  
Byers J.C., 1989, ADV IND ERGONOMICS S, VVol. 32, P481