The Politics of Postindustrial Social Policy: Family Policy Reforms in Britain, Germany, South Korea, and Sweden

被引:48
作者
Fleckenstein, Timo [1 ]
Lee, Soohyun Christine [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Social Policy & Intervent, Oxford, England
关键词
welfare state; party competition; postindustrialization; Britain; Germany; South Korea; Sweden; WELFARE-STATE; LABORS POLICY; CHILD-CARE; GENDER; TRANSFORMATION; RISKS; EMPLOYMENT; CONTINUITY; ECONOMY; WOMENS;
D O I
10.1177/0010414012451564
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Recent welfare reforms across the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have sought to make social policies more employment friendly. Although old social policies of the Golden Age (namely, unemployment protection and old-age security, which were typically geared toward the male breadwinner model) were subject to comprehensive retrenchment, new social policies, especially family policies facilitating work-family reconciliation and female employment participation, experienced substantial expansion. Following the Swedish pioneer, strong male breadwinner countries have expanded employment-oriented family policies since the late 1990s. Against the case of early family policy expansion in Sweden (typically associated with social democracy and an organized women's movement), they examine whether the drivers of employment-oriented family policy have changed since the end of the Golden Age. The authors highlight party competition as key political driver in policy expansion in latecomer countries, whereas postindustrialization (in particular the rise of the new social risk of work-family conflicts, as well as wider changes in the skills profile and needs of postindustrial economies) provides the functional underpinnings for these policies.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 630
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   How can family policies reconcile fertility and women's employment? Comparisons between South Korea and Sweden [J].
Lee, Soomi ;
Duvander, Ann-Zofie ;
Zarit, Steven H. .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF WOMENS STUDIES, 2016, 22 (03) :269-288
[42]   The Neo-Confucian right and family politics in South Korea: The nuclear family as an ideological construct [J].
Chang, KS .
ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 1997, 26 (01) :22-42
[43]   Social investment by popular demand? The electoral politics of employment-centered family policy [J].
Nelson, Moira ;
Giger, Nathalie .
COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2019, 17 (03) :426-446
[44]   Is family-friendly policy (FFP) working in the private sector of South Korea? [J].
Kang, Young-Hee .
SPRINGERPLUS, 2013, 2 :1-11
[45]   Social Policy Change: Work-family Tensions in Sweden, Australia and Canada [J].
Mahon, Rianne ;
Bergqvist, Christina ;
Brennan, Deborah .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 50 (02) :165-182
[46]   Social policy reforms and daughters' schooling in Vietnam [J].
Bélanger, D ;
Liu, JY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 24 (01) :23-38
[47]   Family Structure and Youth Gender Ideologies in Germany and South Korea [J].
Alexander, Alyssa J. ;
Dufur, Mikaela J. ;
Cope, Michael R. ;
Jarvis, Jonathan A. ;
Read, Amy R. .
SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (03)
[48]   Family policy in Germany: mixed results [J].
Fagnani, Jeanne .
TRAVAIL GENRE ET SOCIETES, 2013, (30) :195-201
[49]   Family policy in Germany: Appraisal and assessment [J].
Honekamp, Ivonne .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY HISTORY, 2008, 33 (04) :452-464
[50]   Family policy in Germany: A feminist dilemma? [J].
Trzcinski, E .
FEMINIST ECONOMICS, 2000, 6 (01) :21-44