Selection and mortality: a ten-year follow-up of income decile mortality in Norway

被引:3
作者
Hofoss, Dag [1 ]
Dahl, Espen [2 ]
Elstad, Jon Ivar [3 ]
Cvancarova, Milada [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
[2] Oslo Univ Coll, Oslo, Norway
[3] NOVA Norwegian Social Res, Oslo, Norway
关键词
SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES; SOCIAL-MOBILITY; HEALTHY-LIVES; FAIR-SOCIETY; EXPLANATION; MEN;
D O I
10.1093/eurpub/cks126
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: There is universal agreement that higher mortality goes with lower income. Opinions differ on causality: the association may reflect the damaging effect of poverty on health and survival chances. Conversely, it may reflect selection/reverse causation: low income indicates health problems, and from health problems follow a higher risk of dying. Methods: We studied all deaths in Norway (111 504) during the 10-year period 1994-2003 among persons aged 25-66 years in 1993 (2 261 076). For each year, age-standardized mortality rates were calculated for each 1993 income decile for men and women separately. Income was calculated as family size-adjusted income after taxes but including cash welfare transfers. If the selection theory was correct, one would expect to see the excess mortality in the lower income fractiles decline as the bad risks, over-represented among the poorer, died away. Results: Large income decile variations in mortality remained at the end of the 10-year period: after 10 years, the age-standardized mortality rate for men and women was still much higher in the lower income deciles. Conclusion: As the excess mortality in the poorer income deciles was not much reduced during the 10-year period, excess mortality among persons in bad health in the lower income deciles does not explain the income inequality in mortality in our data set.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 563
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Akselsen A, 2000, FD TRYGD VARIABELLIS
[2]   Does health-selective mobility account for socioeconomic differences in health? Evidence from England and Wales, 1971 to 1991 [J].
Bartley, M ;
Plewis, I .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1997, 38 (04) :376-386
[3]   Does social mobility affect the size of the socioeconomic mortality differential?: evidence from the Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study [J].
Blane, D ;
Harding, S ;
Rosato, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1999, 162 :59-70
[4]  
Blane D, 1999, SOCIOLOGY, V33, P169, DOI 10.1177/S0038038599000097
[5]  
Borgan J, 1996, YB POPULATION RES FI
[6]   Investing in health to improve the wellbeing of the disadvantaged: Reversing the argument of Fair Society, Healthy Lives (The Marmot Review) [J].
Canning, David ;
Bowser, Diana .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2010, 71 (07) :1223-1226
[7]   Rising up with shoe leather? A comment on Fair Society, Healthy Lives (The Marmot Review) [J].
Chandra, Amitabh ;
Vogl, Tom S. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2010, 71 (07) :1227-1230
[8]  
Dahl E, 1993, SOCIOL HLTH ILLNESS, V14, P447
[9]  
FOX AJ, 1982, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V36, P69, DOI 10.1136/jech.36.2.69
[10]  
FOX AJ, 1986, CLASS HLTH RES LONGI, P34