The human side of marine ecosystem-based management (EBM): `Sectoral interplay' as a challenge to implementing EBM

被引:43
作者
Alexander, K. A. [1 ,2 ]
Haward, M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, POB 49, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
Marine; Ecosystem based management; Sectoral interplay; Institutional fit; Governance; PROTECTED AREA; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; GUIDING PRINCIPLES; GOVERNANCE; LESSONS; OCEAN; REGIONALIZATION; SUPPORT; POLICY; ACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although ecosystem-based management (EBM) has been adopted by many management organisations in principle, operationalising EBM has been problematic. A mismatch in institutional arrangements, created by the traditional sectoral focus of marine environmental and resource management, may be one factor acting against EBM implementation. To investigate this potential issue, this study focused on 'sectoral interplay', the challenges and tensions that prevent 'whole of government' cooperation, political consensus among conflicting user and interest groups, and collaboration between government and stakeholders that preconditon implementation of EBM. Four key challenges/tensions to sectoral interplay in marine EBM were found, including: governance structures and mechanisms, communication and sharing, participation and exclusion and fragmentation. Several ways in which these challenges/tensions could be addressed are proposed such as creating co-ordinating structures which operate across sectors and clarifying mandates and precedence between decision-making agencies. There are myriad case study examples from which to learn how to manage, and how not to manage, sectoral interplay in marine governance, and this should be the focus of future research.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, J MANAGE STUD
[2]   Use conflicts in marine ecosystem-based management - The case of oil versus fisheries [J].
Arbo, Peter ;
Pham Thi Thanh Thiay .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 122 :77-86
[3]   Moving beyond a top-down fisheries management approach in the northwestern Mediterranean: Some lessons from the Philippines [J].
Arceo, Hazel O. ;
Cazalet, Bertrand ;
Alino, Porfirio M. ;
Mangialajo, Luisa ;
Francour, Patrice .
MARINE POLICY, 2013, 39 :29-42
[4]   Is "socio-ecological culture" really being taken into account to manage conflicts in the coastal zone? Inputs from Spanish Mediterranean beaches [J].
Ariza, Eduard ;
Pons, Ferran ;
Breton, Francoise .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 134 :183-193
[5]  
Arkema KK, 2006, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V4, P525, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[525:MEMFCT]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   The performance of the Black Sea Commission as a collaborative governance regime [J].
Avoyan, Emma ;
van Tatenhove, Jan ;
Toonen, Hilde .
MARINE POLICY, 2017, 81 :285-292
[8]  
Baechler G., 2013, VIOLENCE ENV DISCRIM
[9]   Integrated coastal management and marine protected areas in the Philippines: Concurrent developments [J].
Balgos, MC .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 48 (11-12) :972-995
[10]   Marine ecosystem approaches to management: challenges and lessons in the United States [J].
Barnes, Cassandra ;
McFadden, Katherine W. .
MARINE POLICY, 2008, 32 (03) :387-392