Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming as Longitudinal Predictors of Reading in Five Alphabetic Orthographies with Varying Degrees of Consistency

被引:224
作者
Landerl, Karin [1 ]
Freudenthaler, H. Harald [1 ]
Heene, Moritz [2 ]
De Jong, Peter F. [3 ]
Desrochers, Alain [4 ]
Manolitsis, George [5 ]
Parrila, Rauno [6 ]
Georgiou, George K. [7 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Graz, Austria
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Crete, Iraklion, Greece
[6] Macquarie Univ, N Ryde, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
DOUBLE-DEFICIT HYPOTHESIS; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA; PHONEMIC AWARENESS; FIT INDEXES; R PACKAGE; RAN; FLUENCY; LITERACY; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1080/10888438.2018.1510936
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although phonological awareness (PA) and rapid automatized naming (RAN) are confirmed as early predictors of reading in a large number of orthographies, it is as yet unclear whether the predictive patterns are universal or language specific. This was examined in a longitudinal study across Grades 1 and 2 with 1,120 children acquiring one of five alphabetic orthographies with different degrees of orthographic complexity (English, French, German, Dutch, and Greek). Path analyses revealed that a universal model could not be confirmed. When we specified the best-fitting model separately for each language, RAN was a consistent predictor of reading fluency in all orthographies, whereas the association between PA and reading was complex and mostly interactive. We conclude that RAN taps into a language-universal cognitive mechanism that is involved in reading alphabetic orthographies (independent of complexity), whereas the PA-reading relationship depends on many factors like task characteristics, developmental status, and orthographic complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 234
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[61]   A Meta-Analysis of the Long-Term Effects of Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, and Reading Comprehension Interventions [J].
Suggate, Sebastian P. .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2016, 49 (01) :77-96
[62]  
Torgesen J.K., 2012, TEST WORD READING EF
[63]   The double deficit hypothesis in the transparent Finnish orthography: a longitudinal study from kindergarten to Grade 2 [J].
Torppa, Minna ;
Parrila, Rauno ;
Niemi, Pekka ;
Lerkkanen, Marja-Kristiina ;
Poikkeus, Anna-Maija ;
Nurmi, Jari-Erik .
READING AND WRITING, 2013, 26 (08) :1353-1380
[64]   Cognitive Development of Fluent Word Reading Does Not Qualitatively Differ Between Transparent and Opaque Orthographies [J].
Vaessen, Anniek ;
Bertrand, Daisy ;
Toth, Denes ;
Csepe, Valeria ;
Faisca, Luis ;
Reis, Alexandra ;
Blomert, Leo .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 102 (04) :827-842
[65]  
van den Bos K. P., 1994, KLEPEL VERANTWOORDIN
[66]   Pathways Into Literacy: The Role of Early Oral Language Abilities and Family Risk for Dyslexia [J].
van Viersen, Sietske ;
de Bree, Elise H. ;
Zee, Marjolein ;
Maassen, Ben ;
van der Leij, Aryan ;
de Jong, Peter F. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (03) :418-428
[67]  
Venezky R.L., 1970, STRUCTURE ENGLISH OR
[68]  
Verhoeven L., 2017, Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems
[69]   Examining the Cross-Lagged Relationships Between RAN and Word Reading in Chinese [J].
Wei, Wei ;
Georgiou, George K. ;
Deng, Ciping .
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2015, 19 (06) :446-455
[70]   THE RELATIONSHIP OF PHONEMIC AWARENESS TO READING ACQUISITION - MORE CONSEQUENCE THAN PRECONDITION BUT STILL IMPORTANT [J].
WIMMER, H ;
LANDERL, K ;
LINORTNER, R ;
HUMMER, P .
COGNITION, 1991, 40 (03) :219-249