Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming as Longitudinal Predictors of Reading in Five Alphabetic Orthographies with Varying Degrees of Consistency

被引:224
作者
Landerl, Karin [1 ]
Freudenthaler, H. Harald [1 ]
Heene, Moritz [2 ]
De Jong, Peter F. [3 ]
Desrochers, Alain [4 ]
Manolitsis, George [5 ]
Parrila, Rauno [6 ]
Georgiou, George K. [7 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Graz, Austria
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Crete, Iraklion, Greece
[6] Macquarie Univ, N Ryde, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
DOUBLE-DEFICIT HYPOTHESIS; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA; PHONEMIC AWARENESS; FIT INDEXES; R PACKAGE; RAN; FLUENCY; LITERACY; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1080/10888438.2018.1510936
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although phonological awareness (PA) and rapid automatized naming (RAN) are confirmed as early predictors of reading in a large number of orthographies, it is as yet unclear whether the predictive patterns are universal or language specific. This was examined in a longitudinal study across Grades 1 and 2 with 1,120 children acquiring one of five alphabetic orthographies with different degrees of orthographic complexity (English, French, German, Dutch, and Greek). Path analyses revealed that a universal model could not be confirmed. When we specified the best-fitting model separately for each language, RAN was a consistent predictor of reading fluency in all orthographies, whereas the association between PA and reading was complex and mostly interactive. We conclude that RAN taps into a language-universal cognitive mechanism that is involved in reading alphabetic orthographies (independent of complexity), whereas the PA-reading relationship depends on many factors like task characteristics, developmental status, and orthographic complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 234
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Adams M.J., 1990, BEGINNING READ THINK
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Scientific Studies of Reading, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S1532799XSSR02012, 10.1207/s1532799xssr0201_2, DOI 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0201_2]
[3]   Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Araujo, Susana ;
Reis, Alexandra ;
Petersson, Karl Magnus ;
Faisca, Luis .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 107 (03) :868-883
[4]   Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slierhtly distorted simple structure [J].
Beauducel, A ;
Wittmann, WW .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 12 (01) :41-75
[5]   Beyond Phonics: The Case for Teaching Children the Logic of the English Spelling System [J].
Bowers, Jeffrey S. ;
Bowers, Peter N. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 52 (02) :124-141
[6]  
Bradley L., 1985, Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling
[7]  
Brus B. T., 1979, EEN MINUUT TEST VORM
[8]   Different Patterns, but Equivalent Predictors, of Growth in Reading in Consistent and Inconsistent Orthographies [J].
Caravolas, Marketa ;
Lervag, Arne ;
Defior, Sylvia ;
Malkova, Gabriela Seidlova ;
Hulme, Charles .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (08) :1398-1407
[9]   Common Patterns of Prediction of Literacy Development in Different Alphabetic Orthographies [J].
Caravolas, Marketa ;
Lervag, Arne ;
Mousikou, Petroula ;
Efrim, Corina ;
Litavsky, Miroslav ;
Onochie-Quintanilla, Eduardo ;
Salas, Nayme ;
Schoeffelova, Miroslava ;
Defior, Sylvia ;
Mikulajova, Marina ;
Seidlova-Malkova, Gabriela ;
Hulme, Charles .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (06) :678-686
[10]   Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? [J].
Castles, A ;
Coltheart, M .
COGNITION, 2004, 91 (01) :77-111