Do Electronic Medical Records Improve Diabetes Quality in Physician Practices?

被引:0
作者
McCullough, Jeffrey S. [1 ]
Christianson, Jon [1 ]
Leerapan, Borwornsom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
HEALTH INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; CARE; ADOPTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To measure the effect of electronic medical records (EMRs) on a publicly reported composite measure indicating optimal diabetes care (ODC) rates in ambulatory settings. Study Design: Data from Minnesota Community Measurement on 557 clinics were used, including information on ODC, EMR adoption, and clinic characteristics. Methods: A difference-in-differences strategy was used to estimate the impact of EMR adoption on patient outcomes while controlling for observed and unobserved clinic characteristics. Results were compared with a cross-sectional analysis of the same data. Results: EMRs had no observable effect on ODC for the average clinic during the first 2 years post-adoption. EMRs may, however, generate modest (+4 percentage point) ODC increases for clinics in large, multisite practices. Cross-sectional analysis likely overestimates the effect of EMRs on quality. Conclusions: There is little evidence that EMR adoption improves diabetes care during the first 2 years postadoption. This is notable as diabetes is a condition for which information technology has the potential to improve care management. The results suggest that policy makers should not expect public sector EMR investments to yield significant short-term improvements in publicly reported measures. (Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(2):144-149)
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 149
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Agha L, 2011, EFFECTS HLTH INFORM
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, NBER DIGEST
  • [3] How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?
    Bertrand, M
    Duflo, E
    Mullainathan, S
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) : 249 - 275
  • [4] The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview
    Black, Ashly D.
    Car, Josip
    Pagliari, Claudia
    Anandan, Chantelle
    Cresswell, Kathrin
    Bokun, Tomislav
    McKinstry, Brian
    Procter, Rob
    Majeed, Azeem
    Sheikh, Aziz
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (01)
  • [5] The Benefits Of Health Information Technology: A Review Of The Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results
    Buntin, Melinda Beeuwkes
    Burke, Matthew F.
    Hoaglin, Michael C.
    Blumenthal, David
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2011, 30 (03) : 464 - 471
  • [6] Health Information Technology: Laying The Infrastructure For National Health Reform
    Buntin, Melinda Beeuwkes
    Jain, Sachin H.
    Blumenthal, David
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (06) : 1214 - 1219
  • [7] Electronic Health Records and Quality of Diabetes Care
    Cebul, Randall D.
    Love, Thomas E.
    Jain, Anil K.
    Hebert, Christopher J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (09) : 825 - 833
  • [8] Finkelstein J, 206 J HOPK U
  • [9] Resistance Is Futile: But It Is Slowing the Pace of EHR Adoption Nonetheless
    Ford, Eric W.
    Menachemi, Nir
    Peterson, Lori T.
    Huerta, Timothy R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2009, 16 (03) : 274 - 281
  • [10] The Effectiveness of Implementing an Electronic Health Record on Diabetes Care and Outcomes
    Herrin, Jeph
    da Graca, Briget
    Nicewander, David
    Fullerton, Cliff
    Aponte, Phil
    Stanek, Greg
    Cowling, Terianne
    Collinsworth, Ashley
    Fleming, Neil S.
    Ballard, David J.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 47 (04) : 1522 - 1540