Prognostic implications of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in acute coronary syndromes with left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or over

被引:0
|
作者
Teixeira, Rogerio [1 ]
Lourenco, Carolina [1 ]
Baptista, Rui [1 ]
Jorge, Elisabete [1 ]
Mendes, Paulo [1 ]
Saraiva, Fatima [1 ]
Monteiro, Silvia [1 ]
Goncalves, Francisco [1 ]
Monteiro, Pedro [1 ]
Ferreira, Maria Joao [1 ]
Freitas, Mario [1 ]
Providencia, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Coimbra, Serv Cardiol, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Acute coronary syndromes; Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; Prognosis; HEART-FAILURE; CLASSIFICATION; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1016/S2174-2049(11)70025-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: There is still debate concerning the impact of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) on long-term prognosis after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Objective: To assess LVEDP and its prognostic implications in ACS patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >= 40%. Methods: We performed a prospective, longitudinal study of 1329 ACS patients from a single center between 2004 and 2006. LVEDP was assessed at the beginning of the coronary angiogram. Patients with LVEF >40% were excluded (n=489). The population was divided into three groups: A - LVEDP <= 19 mmHg (n=186); B - LVEDP >19 and <= 27 mmHg (n=172); and C - LVEDP >27 mmHg (n=131). The primary endpoint of the analysis was readmission for congestive heart failure in the year following the index admission. Results: Mean LVEDP was 22.8 +/- 7.8 mmHg. The groups were similar age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular history, and medication prior to admission. There was an association between higher LVEDP and: admission for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (35.4 vs. 45.9 vs. 56.7%, p<0.01), higher peak levels of cardiac biomarkers, and lower LVEF (56.5 +/- 7.0 vs. 55.3 +/- 7.6 vs. 53.0 +/- 7.5%, p<0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of coronary anatomy, medical therapy during hospital stay and at discharge, or in-hospital mortality. With regard to the primary endpoint, cumulative freedom from congestive heart failure was higher in group A patients (99.4 vs. 97.6 vs. 94.4%, log rank p=0.02). In a multivariate Cox regression model, a 5-mmHg increase in LVEDP (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.10-3.54, p=0.02) remained an independent predictor of the primary endpoint when adjusted for age, systolic function, atrial fibrillation, peak troponin I, renal function, and prescription of diuretics and beta-blockers. Conclusion: In selected population LVEDP was a significant prognostic marker of future admission for congestive heart failure. (C) 2010 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 779
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with ICD
    Cheng, Sijing
    Deng, Yu
    Huang, Hao
    Liu, Xi
    Yu, Yu
    Chen, Xuhua
    Gu, Min
    Niu, Hongxia
    Hua, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2022, 9 (12)
  • [2] Correlation of left atrial strain with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction
    Jia-Li Fan
    Bo Su
    Xin Zhao
    Bing-Yuan Zhou
    Chang-Sheng Ma
    Hai-Peng Wang
    Sheng-Da Hu
    Ya-Feng Zhou
    Yi-Jiao Ju
    Ming-Han Wang
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2020, 36 : 1659 - 1666
  • [3] Correlation of left atrial strain with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction
    Fan, Jia-Li
    Su, Bo
    Zhao, Xin
    Zhou, Bing-Yuan
    Ma, Chang-Sheng
    Wang, Hai-Peng
    Hu, Sheng-Da
    Zhou, Ya-Feng
    Ju, Yi-Jiao
    Wang, Ming-Han
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2020, 36 (09): : 1659 - 1666
  • [4] Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure and Acute Coronary Syndromes
    Teixeira, Rogerio
    Lourenco, Carolina
    Baptista, Rui
    Jorge, Elisabete
    Mendes, Paulo
    Saraiva, Fatima
    Monteiro, Silvia
    Goncalves, Francisco
    Monteiro, Pedro
    Ferreira, Maria J.
    Freitas, Mario
    Providencia, Luis
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2011, 97 (02) : 100 - 109
  • [5] Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure is a predictor of mortality in cardiac surgery independently of left ventricular ejection fraction
    Salem, R.
    Denault, A. Y.
    Couture, P.
    Belisle, S.
    Fortier, A.
    Guertin, M.-C.
    Carrier, M.
    Martineau, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 97 (03) : 292 - 297
  • [6] Prognostic significance of left ventricular ejection fraction in acute coronary syndromes
    Carolina Pereira Mateus, C.
    Passos, M.
    Gerardo, F.
    Miranda, I.
    Lima Lopes, J.
    Sarmento, M.
    Fialho, I.
    Roque, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2024, 26 : 464 - 465
  • [7] Noninvasive Prediction of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Abd-El-Aziz, Tarek A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (01) : 80 - 86
  • [8] LEFT VENTRICULAR END-DIASTOLIC PRESSURE VERSUS LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION AS A PREDICTOR OF SURVIVAL FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGERY
    Nagendran, J.
    Norris, C. M.
    Appoo, J.
    Ross, D. B.
    Nagendran, J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (05) : S185 - S186
  • [9] Left ventricular ejection fraction in the prognosis of acute coronary syndromes
    Eyuboglu, Mehmet
    Akdeniz, Bahri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 234 : 137 - 137
  • [10] EFFECT OF END-DIASTOLIC VOLUME ON THE CANINE LEFT-VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION
    PALACIOS, I
    POWERS, E
    POWELL, WJ
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1985, 109 (05) : 1059 - 1069