Framing the Human Dimensions of Mountain Systems: Integrating Social Science Paradigms for a Global Network of Mountain Observatories

被引:8
作者
Flint, Courtney G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Sociol Social Work & Anthropol, 0730 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Social science; mountain observatories; paradigms; sustainable mountain development; vulnerability; wellbeing; environmental action; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SUSTAINABILITY; VULNERABILITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00110.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Global Network of Mountain Observatories (GNOMO) is an international initiative seeking to increase communication and collaboration and align methodologies to assess commonalities and differences across the world's mountain landscapes. Oriented toward sustainable mountain development, GNOMO requires the integration of social and natural sciences, as well as a diverse array of stakeholder perspectives. This paper highlights challenges associated with integrating social sciences because of the inherent paradigmatic differences within the social sciences. The value orientations of mountain researchers, as well as the divergent societal and institutional values regarding mountains, create a need for new approaches to observing mountain landscapes. A framework is presented to organize complex information about mountain social-ecological systems based on human conditions (from vulnerability to wellbeing), environmental actions (from degradation to stewardship), and environmental conditions that vary across time, space, and scales. A multiparadigmatic, multimethod approach is proposed to combine theory-driven quantitative indicators, qualitative perspectives from diverse knowledge standpoints, and critical inquiries into power relationships to fully represent dynamic mountain systems.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 536
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, HUM DEV IND
  • [2] [Anonymous], FUT EARTH STRAT RES
  • [3] Bliss J.C., 1999, Ecological Stewardship, VIII., P43
  • [4] Interdisciplinarity: How to catalyse collaboration
    Brown, Rebekah R.
    Deletic, Ana
    Wong, Tony H. F.
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 525 (7569) : 315 - 317
  • [5] Applying DPSIR to sustainable development
    Carr, Edward R.
    Wingard, Philip M.
    Yorty, Sara C.
    Thompson, Maiy C.
    Jensen, Natalie K.
    Roberson, Justin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) : 543 - 555
  • [6] Chetan Kumar Chetan Kumar, 2005, Community Development Journal, V40, P275, DOI 10.1093/cdj/bsi036
  • [7] Social vulnerability to environmental hazards
    Cutter, SL
    Boruff, BJ
    Shirley, WL
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 84 (02) : 242 - 261
  • [8] Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment - A review and perspectives
    De Lange, H. J.
    Sala, S.
    Vighi, M.
    Faber, J. H.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 408 (18) : 3871 - 3879
  • [9] Representing mountains: From local and national to global common good
    Debarbieux, Bernard
    Price, Martin F.
    [J]. GEOPOLITICS, 2008, 13 (01) : 148 - 168
  • [10] Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems
    Eakin, Hallie
    Luers, Amy Lynd
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2006, 31 : 365 - 394