Validity of the Optogait photoelectric system for the assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters

被引:123
作者
Lienhard, Karin [1 ]
Schneider, David [1 ]
Maffiuletti, Nicola A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Schulthess Clin, Neuromuscular Res Lab, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Walking; Gait analysis; Criterion-related validity; Floor-based photocells; Orthopedic patients; Elderly; GAITRITE(R) WALKWAY SYSTEM; TEMPORAL PARAMETERS; RELIABILITY; QUANTIFICATION; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.06.015
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminant and concurrent (criterion-related) validity of a recently introduced floor-based photocell system (Optogait, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) with a validated electronic walkway for the assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters. Fifteen patients (mean age +/- standard deviation: 65 +/- 7 years) with total knee arthroplasty and 15 healthy matched control subjects were asked to walk at different velocities while gait variables were recorded simultaneously by the two instruments. The Optogait and the criterion instrument detected the same differences in walking parameters between patients and controls. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.933 (swing time) and 0.999 (cycle time, cadence and walking speed). Cycle time and stance time were significantly longer, while swing time, step length, cadence and walking speed were significantly lower for Optogait (p < 0.001) compared to the criterion instrument. The Optogait system demonstrated high discriminant and concurrent validity with an electronic walkway for the assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters in orthopedic patients and healthy controls. However, the two measuring instruments cannot be used interchangeably for quantitative gait analysis, and further validation of floor-based photocell technology is warranted. (C) 2012 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 504
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite® walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait [J].
Bilney, B ;
Morris, M ;
Webster, K .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2003, 17 (01) :68-74
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Temporospatial characteristics of gait in patients with lower limb muscle hypertonia after traumatic brain injury [J].
Chow, John W. ;
Yablon, Stuart A. ;
Horn, Terry S. ;
Stokic, Dobrivoje S. .
BRAIN INJURY, 2010, 24 (13-14) :1575-1584
[4]   Spatial and Temporal Parameters of Self-Selected and Fast Walking Speeds in Healthy Community-Living Adults Aged 72-98 Years [J].
Chui, Kevin K. ;
Lusardi, Michelle M. .
JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2010, 33 (04) :173-183
[5]   Reliability of techniques to assess human neuromuscular function in vivo [J].
Clark, Brian C. ;
Cook, Summer B. ;
Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (01) :90-101
[6]   Evaluation of an instrumented walkway for measurement of the kinematic parameters of gait [J].
Cutlip, RG ;
Mancinelli, C ;
Huber, F ;
DiPasquale, J .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2000, 12 (02) :134-138
[7]   Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters using inertial measurement units in neurological populations [J].
Esser, Patrick ;
Dawes, Helen ;
Collett, Johnny ;
Feltham, Max G. ;
Howells, Ken .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2011, 34 (04) :558-560
[8]   VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF OPTOJUMP PHOTOELECTRIC CELLS FOR ESTIMATING VERTICAL JUMP HEIGHT [J].
Glatthorn, Julia F. ;
Gouge, Sylvain ;
Nussbaumer, Silvio ;
Stauffacher, Simone ;
Impellizzeri, Franco M. ;
Maffiuletti, Nicola A. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2011, 25 (02) :556-560
[9]   Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis [J].
Henriksen, M ;
Lund, H ;
Moe-Nilssen, R ;
Bliddal, H ;
Danneskiod-Samsoe, B .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2004, 19 (03) :288-297
[10]   Normative spatiotemporal gait parameters in older adults [J].
Hollman, John H. ;
McDade, Eric M. ;
Petersen, Ronald C. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2011, 34 (01) :111-118