Conservation status and threats for African reptiles

被引:64
作者
Tolley, Krystal A. [1 ,2 ]
Alexander, Graham J. [3 ]
Branch, William R. [4 ,5 ]
Bowles, Philip [6 ]
Maritz, Bryan [7 ]
机构
[1] Kirstenbosch Res Ctr, South African Natl Biodivers Inst, Private Bag X7, ZA-7945 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Bot & Zool, Private Bag X1, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, PO Wits, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Port Elizabeth Museum, POB 13147, ZA-6013 Humewood, South Africa
[5] Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Univ, Dept Zool, POB 77000, ZA-6031 Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[6] Conservat Int, Betty & Gordon Moore Ctr Sci & Oceans, IUCN CI Biodivers Assessment Unit, Global Species Programme, 2011 Crystal Dr,Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
[7] Univ Western Cape, Dept Biodivers & Conservat Biol, Private Bag X17, ZA-7535 Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
Biodiversity; Conservation; Global Reptile Assessment; Habitat loss; Species richness; SPECIES RICHNESS; SAMPLING BIAS; BIODIVERSITY; DIVERSITY; EVOLUTIONARY; PRIORITIES; KNOWLEDGE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.006
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The assimilation of information on taxonomy, distribution, basic ecology and conservation status of Africa's reptiles lags far behind that for most other continents. Many regions of mainland Africa are rarely surveyed, resulting in severe knowledge gaps that currently limit effective conservation of African reptiles. Here, we provide a precis on the knowledge gaps and conservation status of mainland African reptiles, and quantify the main threats based on IUCN Red List of Threatened Species assessments using publidy available distribution data. Our results show that these data are insufficient to confidently identify areas of high biodiversity, with large gaps in knowledge in the Horn of Africa, central Africa and West Africa. There is a strong overall taxonomic bias in extinction risk with 45% of families more threatened than expected by chance. Furthermore, Amphisbaenidae, Chameleonidae, Gerrhosauridae, Testudinidae, Viperidae all have a high percentage of their constituent spedes at risk. Overall, land transformation for agriculture, particularly subsistence farming, constitutes the primary threat to African reptiles, and our derived Threat Index based on socio-economic traits of African countries show that risk is high in Burundi, Ethiopia, Liberia, Malawi, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. These findings highlight important challenges facing the conservation of African reptiles, and we suggest that conservation priorities in mainland Africa be focussed on areas where the potential for overall loss of biodiversity is high, particularly in regions where knowledge is inadequate. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 71
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NATL STRATEGY UNPUB
[2]  
[Anonymous], AFR EC OUTL 2014 GLO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[4]  
[Anonymous], ATLAS RED LIST REPTI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key findings and advance tables, P241
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GUIDE REPTILES AMPHI, DOI DOI 10.11646/ZOOTAXA.3835.1.2
[7]  
[Anonymous], AUSTRAL ECOL
[8]  
[Anonymous], J BIOGEOGR IN PRESS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SYNTHESIS REPORT
[10]  
Bates M.F., 2014, Atlas and Red List of the Reptiles of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Suricata 1