Evaluation of optimal droplet size for control of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) with acifluorfen

被引:1
作者
Franca, Lucas X. [1 ]
Dodds, Darrin M. [1 ]
Butts, Thomas R. [2 ]
Kruger, Greg R. [2 ]
Reynolds, Daniel B. [1 ]
Mills, J. Anthony [3 ]
Bond, Jason A. [4 ]
Catchot, Angus L. [5 ]
Peterson, Daniel G. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, 32 Creelman St,Off 114,Dorman Hall, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Agron & Hort, North Platte, NE USA
[3] Bayer CropSci, Collierville, TN USA
[4] Mississippi State Univ, Delta Res & Extens Ctr, Stoneville, MS USA
[5] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Biochem Mol Biol Entomol & Plant Pathol, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[6] Mississippi State Univ, Inst Genom Biocomp & Biotechnol, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
Protoporphyrinogen (PPO)-inhibiting herbicide; pulse width modulation (PWM); prediction modeling; weed control; CARRIER VOLUME; HERBICIDE EFFICACY; SPRAY VOLUME; DRIFT; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; DEPOSITION; RETENTION; IMPACTION; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2020.11
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Acifluorfen is a nonsystemic PPO-inhibiting herbicide commonly used for POST Palmer amaranth control in soybean, peanut, and rice across the southern United States. Concerns have been raised regarding herbicide selection pressure and particle drift, increasing the need for application practices that optimize herbicide efficacy while mitigating spray drift. Field research was conducted in 2016, 2017, and 2018 in Mississippi and Nebraska to evaluate the influence of a range of spray droplet sizes [150 mu m (Fine) to 900 mu m (Ultra Coarse)], using acifluorfen to create a novel Palmer amaranth management recommendation using pulse width modulation (PWM) technology. A pooled site-year generalized additive model (GAM) analysis suggested that 150-mu m (Fine) droplets should be used to obtain the greatest Palmer amaranth control and dry biomass reduction. Nevertheless, GAM models indicated that only 7.2% of the variability observed in Palmer amaranth control was due to differences in spray droplet size. Therefore, location-specific GAM analyses were performed to account for geographical differences to increase the accuracy of prediction models. GAM models suggested that 250-mu m (Medium) droplets optimize acifluorfen efficacy on Palmer amaranth in Dundee, MS, and 310-mu m (Medium) droplets could sustain 90% of maximum weed control. Specific models for Beaver City, NE, indicated that 150-mu m (Fine) droplets provide maximum Palmer amaranth control, and 340-mu m (Medium) droplets could maintain 90% of greatest weed control. For Robinsonville, MS, optimal Palmer amaranth control could be obtained with 370-mu m (Coarse) droplets, and 90% maximum control could be sustained with 680 mu m (Ultra Coarse) droplets. Differences in optimal droplet size across location could be a result of convoluted interactions between droplet size, weather conditions, population density, plant morphology, and soil fertility levels. Future research should adopt a holistic approach to identify and investigate the influence of environmental and application parameters to optimize droplet size recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 519
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] Control of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) regrowth following failed applications of glufosinate and fomesafen
    Haarmann, Jesse A.
    Young, Bryan G.
    Johnson, William G.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 464 - 470
  • [12] Evaluation of electrical and mechanical Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) management in cucumber, peanut, and sweetpotato
    Moore, Levi D. D.
    Jennings, Katherine M. M.
    Monks, David W. W.
    Boyette, Michael D. D.
    Leon, Ramon G. G.
    Jordan, David L. L.
    Ippolito, Stephen J. J.
    Blankenship, Colton D. D.
    Chang, Patrick
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [13] PAM: Decision Support for Long-Term Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control
    Lindsay, Karen
    Popp, Michael
    Norsworthy, Jason
    Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar
    Powles, Stephen
    Lacoste, Myrtille
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (06) : 915 - 927
  • [14] Effect of dicamba rate and application parameters on protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor-resistant and -susceptible Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control
    Coffman, Wyatt
    Barber, Tom
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Kruger, Greg R.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (01) : 22 - 26
  • [15] Differential control of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) by postemergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max)
    Gossett, BJ
    Toler, JE
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (01) : 165 - 168
  • [16] Management of Large, Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Corn
    Crow, Whitney D.
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    Mueller, Thomas C.
    Hayes, Robert M.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) : 611 - 616
  • [17] PALMER AMARANTH (AMARANTHUS-PALMERI) CONTROL IN A CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEM FOR COTTON (GOSSYPIUM-HIRSUTUM)
    KEELING, JW
    SIDERS, KT
    ABERNATHY, JR
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 5 (01) : 137 - 141
  • [18] Grain Sorghum and Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Response to Herbicide Programs and Agronomic Practices
    Besancon, Thierry E.
    Heiniger, Ronnie W.
    Weisz, Randy
    Everman, Wesley J.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (06) : 781 - 792
  • [19] Multiple herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Connecticut: confirmation and response to POST herbicides
    Aulakh, Jatinder S.
    Chahal, Parminder S.
    Kumar, Vipan
    Price, Andrew J.
    Guillard, Karl
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 457 - 463
  • [20] Response of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) and sugarbeet to desmedipham and phenmedipham
    Beiermann, Clint W.
    Creech, Cody F.
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    Harveson, Robert
    Lawrence, Nevin C.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 440 - 448