Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from European conventional and organic dairy farms

被引:147
|
作者
Olesen, JE
Schelde, K
Weiske, A
Weisbjerg, MR
Asman, WAH
Djurhuus, J
机构
[1] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Dept Agroecol, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] Inst Energy & Environm, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Dept Anim Nutr & Physiol, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
关键词
farm model; carbon dioxide; CO2; methane; CH4; nitrous oxide; N2O; conventional farming; organic farming; dairy fanning;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.022
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Agriculture is an important contributor to global emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), in particular for methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Emissions from farms with a stock of ruminant animals are particularly high due to CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation and manure handling, and due to the intensive nitrogen (N) cycle on such farms leading to direct and indirect N2O emissions. The whole-farm model, FarmGHG, was designed to quantify the flows of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) on dairy farms. The aim of the model was to allow quantification of effects of management practices and mitigation options on GHG emissions. The model provides assessments of emissions from both the production unit and the pre-chains. However, the model does not quantify changes in soil C storage. Model dairy farms were defined within five European agro-ecological zones for both organic and conventional systems. The model farms were all defined to have the same utilised agricultural area (50 ha). Cows on conventional and organic model farms were defined to achieve the same milk yield, so the basic difference between conventional and organic farms was expressed in the livestock density. The organic farms were defined to be 100% self-sufficient with respect to feed. The conventional farms, on the other hand, import concentrates as supplementary feed and their livestock density was defined to be 75% higher than the organic farm density. Regional differences between farms were expressed in the milk yield, the crop rotations, and the cow housing system and manure management method most common to each region. The model results showed that the emissions at farm level could be related to either the farm N surplus or the farm N efficiency. The farm N surplus appeared to be a good proxy for GHG emissions per unit of land area. The GHG emissions increased from 3.0 Mg CO2-eq ha(-1) year(-1) at a N surplus of 56 kg N ha(-1) year(-1) to 15.9 Mg CO2-eq ha(-1) year(-1) at a N surplus of 319 kg N ha(-1) year(-1). The farm N surplus can relatively easily be determined on practical farms from the farm records of imports and exports and the composition of the crop rotation. The GHG emissions per product unit (milk or metabolic energy) were quite closely related to the farm N efficiency, and a doubling of the N efficiency from 12.5 to 25% reduced the emissions per product unit by ca. 50%. The farm N efficiency may therefore be used as a proxy for comparing the efficiencies of farms with respect to supplying products with a low GHG emission. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 220
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Soil greenhouse gas emissions from a sisal chronosequence in Kenya
    Wachiye, Sheila
    Merbold, Lutz
    Vesala, Timo
    Rinne, Janne
    Leitner, Sonja
    Rasanen, Matti
    Vuorinne, Ilja
    Heiskanen, Janne
    Pellikka, Petri
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2021, 307
  • [42] Compaction effects on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from solid dairy manure
    Chang, Fangle
    Fabian-Wheeler, Eileen
    Richard, Tom L.
    Hile, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 332
  • [43] A proposed approach to estimate and reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from whole farms
    Janzen, H. H.
    Angers, D. A.
    Boehm, M.
    Bolinder, M.
    Desjardins, R. L.
    Dyer, J. A.
    Ellert, B. H.
    Gibb, D. J.
    Gregorich, E. G.
    Helgason, B. L.
    Lemke, R.
    Masse, D.
    McGinn, S. M.
    McAllister, T. A.
    Newlands, N.
    Pattey, E.
    Rochette, P.
    Smith, W.
    VandenBygaart, A. J.
    Wang, H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (03) : 401 - 418
  • [44] Greenhouse gas emissions from soils A review
    Oertel, Cornelius
    Matschullat, Joerg
    Zurba, Kamal
    Zimmermann, Frank
    Erasmi, Stefan
    CHEMIE DER ERDE-GEOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 76 (03) : 327 - 352
  • [45] Variability of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Relation to Economic and Ecological Indicators from Cattle Farms
    Sieczko, Leszek
    Koloszko-Chomentowska, Zofia
    Sieczko, Anna
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (08)
  • [46] Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Organic Manure Composting: The Effect of Membrane Cover
    Varga, Zsolt Istvan
    Shahzad, Shaghil
    Ramay, Muhammad Wajahat
    Damak, Mariem
    Gulyas, Miklos
    Beres, Andras
    Gyuricza, Csaba
    Szekacs, Andras
    Aleksza, Laszlo
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [47] Greenhouse gas emissions from a managed grassland
    Jones, SK
    Rees, RM
    Skiba, UM
    Ball, BC
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2005, 47 (2-4) : 201 - 211
  • [48] Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Arable Land and Grassland: The Case for Organic Farming-A Critical Review
    Gerke, Joerg
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [49] Greenhouse gas emissions from windrow composting of organic wastes: Patterns and emissions factors
    Vergara, Sintana E.
    Silver, Whendee L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (12)
  • [50] DAIRY FARMING AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN LATVIA: SOME METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY
    Sudars, Ritvars
    Berzina, Laima
    Priekulis, Juris
    14TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, : 577 - 583