Validation of three deformable image registration algorithms for the thorax

被引:28
|
作者
Latifi, Kujtim [2 ,4 ]
Zhang, Geoffrey [2 ,4 ]
Stawicki, Marnix [3 ]
van Elmpt, Wouter [3 ]
Dekker, Andre [3 ]
Forster, Kenneth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Alabama, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mitchell Canc Inst, Mobile, AL 36604 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Tampa, FL 33682 USA
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol MAASTRO, NL-6229 ET Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ S Florida, Dept Phys, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
来源
关键词
DIR; image registration; deformable; validation; 4D CT; 4-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL-FLOW METHOD; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; DEMONS ALGORITHM; CT IMAGES; VENTILATION; RADIOTHERAPY; SCANS;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.3834
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Deformable image registration (DIR) has been proposed for lung ventilation calculation using 4D CT. Spatial accuracy of DIR can be evaluated using expert landmark correspondences. Additionally, image differences between the deformed and the target images give a degree of accuracy of DIR algorithms for the same image modality registration. DIR of the normal end-expiration (50%), end-inspiration (0%), midexpiration (30%), and midinspiration image (70%) phases of the 4D CT images was used to correlate the voxels between the respiratory phases. Three DIR algorithms, optical flow (OF), diffeomorphic morphons (DM), and diffeomorphic demons (DD) were validated using a 4D thorax model, consisting of a 4D CT image dataset, along with associated landmarks delineated by a radiologist. Image differences between the deformed and the target images were used to evaluate the degree of registration accuracy of the three DIR algorithms. In the validation of the DIR algorithms, the average target registration error (TRE) for normal end-expiration-to-end-inspiration registration with one standard deviation (SD) for the DIR algorithms was 1.6 +/- 0.9 mm (maximum 3.1 mm) for OF, 1.4 +/- 0.6 mm (maximum 3.3 mm) for DM, and 1.4 +/- 0.7 mm (maximum 3.3 mm) for DD, indicating registration errors were within two voxels. As a reference, the median value of TRE between 0 and 50% phases with rigid registration only was 5.0 mm with one SD of 2.5 mm and the maximum value of 12.0 mm. For the OF algorithm, 81% of voxels were within a difference of 50 HU, and 93% of the voxels were within 100 HU. For the DM algorithm, 69% of voxels were within 50 HU, and 87% within 100 HU. For the DD algorithm, 71% of the voxels were within 50 HU, and 87% within a difference of 100 HU. These data suggest that the three DIR methods perform accurate registrations in the thorax region. The mean TRE for all three DIR methods was less than two voxels suggesting that the registration performed by all methods are equally accurate in the thorax.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 30
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Five Commercially-Available Algorithms for Deformable Image Registration
    Shah, A.
    Pukala, J.
    Johnson, P.
    Staton, R.
    Meeks, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 399 - 399
  • [33] Validation of the deformable image registration system elastix in the head and neck region
    Zukauskaite, R.
    Brink, C.
    Hansen, C. R.
    Bertelsen, A.
    Grau, C.
    Johansen, J.
    Eriksen, J. G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S499 - S500
  • [34] Validation of an accelerated 'demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy
    Wang, H
    Dong, L
    O'Daniel, J
    Mohan, R
    Garden, AS
    Ang, KK
    Kuban, DA
    Bonnen, M
    Chang, JY
    Cheung, R
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (12): : 2887 - 2905
  • [35] Validation of a novel hybrid deformable image registration algorithm for cervix cancer
    Buschmann, M.
    Furtado, H.
    Georg, D.
    Seppenwoolde, Y.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S934 - S935
  • [36] Validation of Deformable Image Registration Software Using a Standard CT Phantom
    Verdecchia, K.
    Qiu, L.
    Magnelli, A.
    Balik, S.
    Kost, S.
    Godley, A.
    Xia, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3174 - 3175
  • [37] Commissioning and validation of commercial deformable image registration software for adaptive contouring
    Jamema, Swamidas V.
    Phurailatpam, Reena
    Paul, Siji N.
    Joshi, Kishore
    Deshpande, D. D.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 47 : 1 - 8
  • [38] A new validation method of thoracic CT to CT deformable image registration
    Nielsen, M. S.
    Ostergaard, L. R.
    Nystrom, P. M.
    Carl, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S247 - S247
  • [39] Experimental Validation of Dose Warping Accuracy From Deformable Image Registration
    Varadhan
    Hui, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [40] Construction of an anthropopathic abdominal phantom for accuracy validation of deformable image registration
    Liao, Y. L.
    Chen, H. B.
    Zhou, L. H.
    Zhen, X.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2016, 24 : S717 - S723