Constraints on the frequency-magnitude relation and maximum magnitudes in the UK from observed seismicity and glacio-isostatic recovery rates

被引:34
作者
Main, I
Irving, D
Musson, R
Reading, A
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Geol & Geophys, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] British Geol Survey, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
gamma distribution; glacio-isostatic recovery; neotectonics; seismic hazard; seismotectonics; self-organized criticality;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-246X.1999.00796.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Earthquake populations have recently been shown to have many similarities with critical-point phenomena, with fractal scaling of source sizes (energy or seismic moment) corresponding to the observed Gutenberg-Richter (G-R) frequency-magnitude law holding at low magnitudes. At high magnitudes, the form of the distribution depends on the seismic moment release rate (M)over dot and the maximum magnitude m(max). The G-R law requires a sharp truncation at an absolute maximum magnitude for finite (M)over dot. In contrast, the gamma distribution has an exponential tail which allows a soft or 'credible' maximum to be determined by negligible contribution to the total seismic moment release. Here we apply both distributions to seismic hazard in the mainland UK and its immediate continental shelf, constrained by a mixture of instrumental, historical and neotectonic data. Tectonic moment release rates for the seismogenic part of the lithosphere are calculated from a flexural-plate model for glacio-isostatic recovery, constrained by vertical deformation rates from tide-gauge and geomorphological data. Earthquake focal mechanisms in the UK show near-vertical strike-slip faulting, with implied directions of maximum compressive stress approximately in the NNW-SSE direction, consistent with the tectonic model. Maximum magnitudes are found to be in the range 6.3-7.5 for the G-R law, or 7.0-8.2 m(L) for the gamma distribution, which compare with a maximum observed in the time period of interest of 6.1 m(L). The upper bounds are conservative estimates, based on 100 per cent seismic release of the observed vertical neotectonic deformation. Glacio-isostatic recovery is predominantly an elastic rather than a seismic process, so the true value of m(max) is likely to be nearer the lower end of the quoted range.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 550
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   ENGINEERING SEISMOLOGY [J].
AMBRASEYS, NN .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1988, 17 (01) :1-105
[2]   Earthquake scaling laws for creeping and non-creeping faults [J].
Amelung, F ;
King, G .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1997, 24 (05) :507-510
[3]   Large-scale tectonic deformation inferred from small earthquakes [J].
Amelung, F ;
King, G .
NATURE, 1997, 386 (6626) :702-705
[4]   Fennoscandian earthquakes: Whole crustal rupturing related to postglacial rebound [J].
Arvidsson, R .
SCIENCE, 1996, 274 (5288) :744-746
[5]   EARTHQUAKES AS A SELF-ORGANIZED CRITICAL PHENOMENON [J].
BAK, P ;
TANG, C .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1989, 94 (B11) :15635-15637
[6]   SELF-ORGANIZED CRITICALITY [J].
BAK, P ;
TANG, C ;
WIESENFELD, K .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1988, 38 (01) :364-374
[7]  
BONILLA MG, 1984, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V74, P2379
[8]  
BRERETON NR, 1987, RG8714 BRIT GEOL SUR
[9]  
CAMPBELL KW, 1983, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V73, P1099
[10]  
CHARLES K, 1993, GRAVITY GEOID INT AS, V113, P39