Plasticity solutions for soil behaviour around contracting cavities and tunnels

被引:21
作者
Yu, HS [1 ]
Rowe, RK
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Dept Civil Surveying & Environm Engn, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON, Canada
关键词
unloading of cavities; critical state models; plasticity; tunnelling; normally and overconsolidated clays;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199910)23:12<1245::AID-NAG30>3.3.CO;2-N
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The action of tunnel excavation reduces the in-situ stresses along the excavated circumference and can therefore be simulated by unloading of cavities from the in-situ stress state. Increasing evidence suggests that soil behavior in the plane perpendicular to the tunnel axis can be modelled reasonably by a contracting cylindrical cavity, while movements ahead of an advancing tunnel heading can be better predicted by spherical cavity contraction theory. In the past, solutions for unloading of cavities from in-situ stresses in cohesive-frictional soils have mainly concentrated on the small strain, cylindrical cavity model. Large strain spherical cavity contraction solutions with a non-associated Mohr-Coulomb model do not seem to be widely available for tunnel applications. Also, cavity unloading solutions in undrained clays have been developed only in terms of total stresses with a linear elastic-perfectly plastic soil model. The total stress analyses do not account for the effects of strain hardening/softening, variable soil stiffness, and soil stress history (OCR), The effect of these simplifying assumptions on the predicted soil behavior around tunnels is not known. In this paper, analytical and semi-analytical solutions are presented for unloading of both cylindrical and spherical cavities from in-situ state of stresses under both drained and undrained conditions. The nonassociated Mohr-Coulomb model and various critical state theories are used respectively to describe the drained and undrained stress-strain behaviors of the soils. The analytical solutions presented in this paper are developed in terms of large strain formulations. These solutions can be used to serve two main purposes: (1) to provide models for predicting soil behavior around tunnels; (2) to provide valuable benchmark solutions for verifying various numerical methods involving both Mohr-Coulomb and critical state plasticity models. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiely & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1245 / 1279
页数:35
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J NUMER ANAL MET
[2]  
Atkinson JH, 1978, MECH SOILS
[3]   GROUND RESPONSE CURVES FOR ROCK TUNNELS [J].
BROWN, ET ;
BRAY, JW ;
LADANYI, B ;
HOEK, E .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1983, 109 (01) :15-39
[4]   CAVITY EXPANSION IN COHESIVE FRICTIONAL SOILS [J].
CARTER, JP ;
BOOKER, JR ;
YEUNG, SK .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1986, 36 (03) :349-358
[5]  
DAVIS EH, SOIL MECH SELECTED T
[6]  
GENS A, 1988, ENG COMPUT, V5, P178
[7]  
Lo K.Y., 1984, TUNNELLING SOIL ROCK, P48
[8]  
Mair R.J., 1979, Ph.D. thesis
[9]  
MAIR RJ, 1993, PREDICTIVE SOIL MECHANICS, P449
[10]   EFFECTS OF DILATANCY AND YIELD CRITERIA ON DISPLACEMENTS AROUND TUNNELS [J].
OGAWA, T ;
LO, KY .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 24 (01) :100-113