Dose-response modeling of continuous endpoints

被引:303
作者
Slob, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
dose-response modeling; benchmark dose; continuous endpoints; critical effect size; probabilistic assessment factor;
D O I
10.1093/toxsci/66.2.298
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
A family of (nested) dose-response models is introduced herein that can be used for describing the change in any continuous endpoint as a function of dose. A member from this family of models may be selected using the likelihood ratio test as a criterion, to prevent overparameterization. The proposed methodology provides for a formal approach of model selection, and a transparent way of assessing the benchmark dose. Apart from a number of natural constraints, the model expressions follow from an obvious way of quantifying differences in sensitivity between populations. As a consequence, dose-response data that relate to both sexes can be efficiently analyzed by incorporating the data from both sexes in the same analysis, even if the sexes are not equally sensitive to the compound studied. The idea of differences in sensitivity is closely related to the assessment factors used in risk assessment. Thus, the models are directly applicable to estimating such factors, if data concerning populations to be compared are available. Such information is valuable for further validation or adjustment of default assessment factors, as well as for informing distributional assessment factors in a probabilistic risk assessment. The various applications of the proposed methodology are illustrated by real data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 312
页数:15
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY .2. COMPARISON OF GENERIC BENCHMARK DOSE ESTIMATES WITH NO OBSERVED ADVERSE EFFECT LEVELS
    ALLEN, BC
    KAVLOCK, RJ
    KIMMEL, CA
    FAUSTMAN, EM
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 23 (04): : 487 - 495
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1958, Planning of Experiments
  • [3] APPEL MJ, IN PRESS EVALUATION
  • [4] Noncancer risk assessment: A probabilistic alternative to current practice
    Baird, SJS
    Cohen, JT
    Graham, JD
    Shlyakhter, AI
    Evans, JS
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (01): : 79 - 102
  • [5] CALCULATION OF BENCHMARK DOSES FROM CONTINUOUS DATA
    CRUMP, KS
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 1995, 15 (01) : 79 - 89
  • [6] A NEW METHOD FOR DETERMINING ALLOWABLE DAILY INTAKES
    CRUMP, KS
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1984, 4 (05): : 854 - 871
  • [7] DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY .1. CHARACTERIZATION OF DATABASE AND DETERMINATION OF NO OBSERVED ADVERSE EFFECT LEVELS
    FAUSTMAN, EM
    ALLEN, BC
    KAVLOCK, RJ
    KIMMEL, CA
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 23 (04): : 478 - 486
  • [8] GAYLOR DW, 1990, NEUROTOXICOLOGY, V11, P211
  • [9] Distributions of individual susceptibility among humans for toxic effects - How much protection does the traditional tenfold factor provide for what fraction of which kinds of chemicals and effects?
    Hattis, D
    Banati, P
    Goble, R
    [J]. UNCERTAINTY IN THE RISK ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS, 1999, 895 : 286 - 316
  • [10] Conversion factors estimating indicative chronic no-observed-adverse-effect levels from short-term toxicity data
    Kramer, HJ
    vandenHam, WA
    Slob, W
    Pieters, MN
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 23 (03) : 249 - 255