Dimensionality, internal consistency, and item analysis of the national health and nutrition examination surveys activities of daily living instrument among patients with report of low back pain

被引:8
作者
Cook, CE
Richardson, JK
Pietrobon, R
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Div Phys Therapy, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27278 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Hlth Syst, Ctr Excellenc Surg Outcomes, Div Orthopaed Surg, Durham, NC USA
关键词
activities of daily living; low back pain; item response theory;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.01.006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To measure selected psychometric properties of individual item responses from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) activities of daily living (ADL) instrument among a population of patients with low back pain (LBP). Methods: The study group consisted of 926 individual attendees of a traditional medical appointment. All subjects had self-reported LBP and completed questions within the NHANES ADL instrument, a 16-item questionnaire designed to represent the internal latent construct of ADL. Data analyses included exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency measures, and polytomous (graded) item response theory. Results: The NHANES ADL instrument is a unidimensional and internally consistent measure of ADL. Graded item response theory analyses indicated that although some variability exists, all 16 single items were sensitive measures of the latent construct of ADL. Most item responses demonstrated high discrimination. Conclusion: Individual use of selected items of the NHANES ADL instrument may further improve the capacity of the health care provider in measuring and recording dysfunction associated with LBP.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 189
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care
    Flores, L
    Gatchel, RJ
    Polatin, PB
    [J]. SPINE, 1997, 22 (14) : 1622 - 1633
  • [12] A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
    Fritz, JM
    Irrgang, JJ
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2001, 81 (02): : 776 - 788
  • [13] Functional status and disability questionnaires: What do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires
    Grotle, M
    Brox, JI
    Vollestad, NK
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (01) : 130 - 140
  • [14] Psychometric properties of the HIT-6 among patients in a headache-specialty practice
    Kawata, AK
    Coeytaux, RR
    DeVellis, RF
    Finkel, AG
    Mann, JD
    Kahn, K
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2005, 45 (06): : 638 - 643
  • [15] Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go?
    Mannion, AF
    Elfering, A
    Staerkle, R
    Junge, A
    Grob, D
    Semmer, NK
    Jacobshagen, N
    Dvorak, J
    Boos, N
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (10) : 1014 - 1026
  • [16] Defining and using quality of life: a survey of health care professionals
    McKevitt, C
    Redfern, J
    La-Placa, V
    Wolfe, CDA
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 17 (08) : 865 - 870
  • [17] Lumbar spine range of motion as a measure of physical and functional impairment: an investigation of validity
    Nattrass, CL
    Nitschke, JE
    Disler, PB
    Chou, MJ
    Ooi, KT
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 13 (03) : 211 - 218
  • [18] *NHANES, 2005, 1999 2000 PUBL DAT R
  • [19] Clinically important outcomes in low back pain
    Ostelo, RWJG
    de Vet, HCW
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04): : 593 - 607
  • [20] Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain
    Pengel, LHM
    Refshauge, KM
    Maher, CG
    [J]. SPINE, 2004, 29 (08) : 879 - 883