Can intermuscular cleavage planes provide proper transverse screw angle? Comparison of two paraspinal approaches

被引:12
作者
Cheng, Xiaofei [1 ]
Ni, Bin [1 ]
Liu, Qi [1 ]
Chen, Jinshui [1 ]
Guan, Huapeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
关键词
Paraspinal approach; Computed tomography; Intermuscular cleavage plane; Transverse screw angle; Lumbar spine; LUMBAR PEDICLE SCREWS; SPLITTING APPROACH; PLACEMENT; SPINE; SACRUM; VERTEBRAE; ACCURACY; S1;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-012-2464-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this study was to determine which paraspinal approach provided a better transverse screw angle (TSA) for each vertebral level in lower lumbar surgery. Axial computed tomography (CT) images of 100 patients, from L3 to S1, were used to measure the angulation parameters, including transverse pedicle angle (TPA) and transverse cleavage plane angle (TCPA) of entry from the two approaches. The difference value between TCPA and TPA, defined as difference angle (DA), was calculated. Statistical differences of DA obtained by the two approaches and the angulation parameters between sexes, and the correlation between each angulation parameter and age or body mass index (BMI) were analyzed. TPA ranged from about 16A degrees at L3 to 30A degrees at S1. TCPA through the Wiltse's and Weaver's approach ranged from about -10A degrees and 25A degrees at L3 to 12A degrees and 32A degrees at S1, respectively. The absolute values of DA through the Weaver's approach were significantly lower than those through the Wiltse's approach at each level. The angulation parameters showed no significant difference with sex and no significant correlation with age or BMI. In the lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5) and S1, pedicle screw placement through the Weaver's approach may more easily yield the preferred TSA consistent with TPA than that through the Wiltse's approach. The reference values obtained in this paper may be applied regardless of sex, age or BMI and the descriptive statistical results may be used as references for applying the two paraspinal approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 127
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Lower Dorsal and Lumber Pedicle Morphometry in Indian Population A Study of Four Hundred Fifty Vertebrae [J].
Acharya, Shankar ;
Dorje, Tsewang ;
Srivastava, Abhishek .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (10) :E378-E384
[2]   The human sacrum and safe approaches for screw placement [J].
Arman, Candan ;
Naderi, Sait ;
Kiray, Amac ;
Aksu, Funda Tastekin ;
Yilmaz, Hakan Sinan ;
Tetik, Sueleyman ;
Korman, Esin .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 16 (08) :1046-1049
[3]  
Barber JW, 1998, J SPINAL DISORD, V11, P215
[4]   Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws [J].
Brown, CA ;
Lenke, LG ;
Bridwell, KH ;
Geideman, WM ;
Hasan, SA ;
Blanke, K .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (14) :1566-1571
[5]   Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: Is there a relationship to muscle retraction? [J].
Datta, G ;
Gnanalingham, KK ;
Peterson, D ;
Mendoza, N ;
O'Neill, K ;
Van Dellen, J ;
McGregor, A ;
Hughes, SPF .
NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 54 (06) :1413-1420
[6]   Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis [J].
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke ;
Neo, Masashi ;
Takemoto, Mitsuru ;
Ota, Masato ;
Nakamura, Takashi .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (04) :500-508
[7]   Anatomic Features of the Paramedian Muscle-Splitting Approaches to the Lumbar Spine [J].
Hoh, Daniel J. ;
Wang, Michael Y. ;
Ritland, Stephen L. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 66 (03) :13-24
[8]   Closed posterior superior iliac spine impeding pediculocorporeal S-1 screw insertion [J].
Kaptanoglu, E ;
Okutan, O ;
Tekdemir, I ;
Beskonakli, E ;
Deda, H .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 99 (02) :229-234
[9]   Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery - A histologic and enzymatic analysis [J].
Kawaguchi, Y ;
Matsui, H ;
Tsuji, H .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (08) :941-944
[10]   MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF THE PEDICLES OF THORACIC AND LUMBAR VERTEBRAE IN KOREANS [J].
KIM, NH ;
LEE, HM ;
CHUNG, IH ;
KIM, HJ ;
KIM, SJ .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (12) :1390-1394