The effect of incidental affect on preference for the status quo

被引:36
作者
Yen, HsiuJu Rebecca [2 ]
Chuang, Shih-Chieh [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Dept Business Adm, 168 Univ Rd, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Informat Management, Jhongli, Taiwan
关键词
Emotions; Status quo bias; Incidental affect; Omission bias; Appraisal tendency model;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-008-0084-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The authors report results from four experiments that describe the influence of incidental affect on preference for the status quo. The first and second experiments, each using different affect induction methods, demonstrated that positive affect increased and negative affect reduced the choice of the status quo alternative. The third experiment replicated the effect of incidental affect on a separate dimension of status quo bias, the preference of omission. The last experiment investigated whether preference for the status quo was affected by four specific emotions that differed along valence and certainty appraisal dimensions. Compared with affective states associated with uncertainty, affective states associated with certainty led to a greater magnitude of status quo bias. The certainty appraisals mediated the effect of specific emotions on preference for the status quo, regardless of the emotion valence. The findings extend our knowledge by showing that incidental affect can influence consumer choice through emotion-related appraisals.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 537
页数:16
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   How good gets better and bad gets worse: Understanding the impact of affect on evaluations of known brands [J].
Adaval, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (03) :352-367
[2]   The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion [J].
Anderson, CJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (01) :139-167
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MOOD USE GEN KNOWLED
[5]   Distinguishing optimism from denial: Optimistic beliefs predict attention to health threats [J].
Aspinwall, LG ;
Brunhart, SM .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 22 (10) :993-1003
[6]   STUDIES ON ANGER AND AGGRESSION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORIES OF EMOTION [J].
AVERILL, JR .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1983, 38 (11) :1145-1160
[7]   The role of emotions in marketing [J].
Bagozzi, RP ;
Gopinath, M ;
Nyer, PU .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 27 (02) :184-206
[8]   REFERENCE POINTS AND OMISSION BIAS [J].
BARON, J ;
RITOV, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 59 (03) :475-498
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]   MOOD AND PERSUASION - A COGNITIVE RESPONSE ANALYSIS [J].
BLESS, H ;
BOHNER, G ;
SCHWARZ, N ;
STRACK, F .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1990, 16 (02) :331-345